Here's an interesting looking book available at Amazon.com:
And here is an interesting review of the book:
A straightforward, scholarly written, even handed, well researched and logically presented presentation of the many anomalys surrounding the 9/11 atrocities.
The authors keep their terms of reference very tight and do not refer to the increasingly awkward questions like: Why do the mainstream media not carry this story?
Sometimes the truth shows up where you least expect it.
Forty-eight hours before the Louis Farrakhan-led march of African Americans through the streets of Washington, D.C., the controversial minister Thursday repeated his charge that levees in New Orleans were intentionally blown up on Aug. 29, following Hurricane Katrina. He also implied that the Bush administration may have orchestrated the Sept. 11, 2001, terrorist attacks on the U.S.
Can someone explain to me what the statement in bold means?
The city scientist who led the effort to identify 9/11 victims said officials made sure to keep the remains of the three terrorists identified away from those of the innocents killed.
The remains of the killers were removed from the medical examiner's makeshift memorial park on the East Side and "put in another place," Robert Shaler, former head of the medical examiner's forensic unit, told the Daily News.
There have been a few new 9/11 related DVDs that have come out. I wanted to mention them as they come out so that those interested are aware, and to hopefully provide some sales for those working hard to create new methods of spreading 9/11 news.
Here are the details of the new DVD produced by Carol Brouillet:
Behind Every Terrorist - There is a Bush was a benefit show for the San Francisco International Inquiry into 9-11. It featured talented comics, great music, brilliant flash movies, spoken word, and the confessions of a 9-11 truth activist.
Just got an email from thoughtpolicy.com stating that they are going out of business. They offer a bunch of different shirts including the 9/11 related shirt shown below. They are offering 50% off of all of their merchandise, so if you haven't checked them out now would be a good time.
Emergency personnel tapes released in August contain the following statements concerning "flashes" in the world trade centers prior to their collapse:
The captain of emergency medical services said "somewhere around the middle of the world trade center there was this orange and red flash coming out ... initially it was just one flash then this flash just kept popping all the way around the building and that building had started to explode ... and with each popping sound it was initially an orange and then red flash came out of the building and then it would just go all around the building on both sides ... as far as could see these popping sounds and the explosions were getting bigger going both up and down and then all around the building" (page 15 -- pdf file; Google's web version is here)
Orwell and the 9/11 â€œIntelligence Triumphâ€ - Mujca.com
The preface of veteran Middle East CIA agent Robert Baer's 2002 book See No Evil ends on an astonishing note: "The other day a reporter friend told me that one of the highest-ranking CIA officials had said to him, off the record, that when the dust finally clears, Americans will see that September 11 was a triumph for the intelligence community, not a failure."
9/11 an intelligence triumph? If the horrific, nationally televised mass murder of almost 3,000 Americans, the destruction of our most prominent architectural monument, the successful attack on our nation's top military command center, the controlled demolition of our Constitution, and the initiation of a series of military quagmires that are destroying our economy and hence our world primacy was an â€œintelligence triumph,â€ maybe we need more intelligence failures. Patrick Fitzgerald, will you please give Baer's journalist friend the Judith Miller treatment so we can learn the identity of this top-ranking CIA official who considers 9/11 an intelligence triumph? Perhaps he could be persuaded to kindly explain to your grand jury exactly what he meant.
Check it out, from the horses mouth itself. PNAC is pulling out the Pearl Harbor comparisons again, and making yet another pathetic attempt of linking Iraq to 9/11. Jon Gold made the following clever statement that may one day be spoken at a future 9/11 trial:
"...And on the 4th Anniversary of that dreadful day, your so called, "Think Tank" dared to legitimize your actions by comparing them to the very event that inspired you in the first place. As a way to legitimize your crime. How dare you... "
Are we as a nation safer for having invaded Iraq? Was the decision to remove Saddam from power after 9-11 a step forward in the war on terror, or not? The answer is yes.
Is the answer absolutely, yes? Of course not. Wars don't work that way. Did the decision by the country to wage war on both Japan and Germany in the wake of Pearl Harbor make the U.S. safer at first? No. Even after critical successes at Midway, in North Africa and Italy, thousands of Americans still lost their lives. The war had to be won, and the cost was high precisely because our enemies knew it was going to be a fight to the death. And Americans understood that security could not be had in a piecemeal fashion given the nature of the enemies we faced.
The disastrous 9/11 attack took place a long time ago, yet its essential elements are still being debated on the Internet. While the disputes themselves and the supporting evidence make for disturbing reading, their existence continues to illustrate the gulf between a sizeable minority of American citizenry and the government of the country in which it must put its trust if civil society is to prosper. What is just as disturbing - or even moreso - is the quantity and quality of the evidence that continues to turn up. Much of it would seem to indicate that indeed there are puzzling discrepancies between what is commonly understood to be the case about 9/11 and what actually occurred.
My argument is as straightforward as it is secure and convincing: Our government was behind the terror attacks of 9-11.
To be believed, the argument requires that one think adult thoughts, have a more than casually informed view of history, and be willing to distinguish a fact from a sweet, soothing fiction.
We are told that on 9-11, 2001, we were attacked by a band of terrorist prodigies. 19 fanatical Arab wunderkinds of terror. They eluded our vast intelligence network and somehow managed to take out the Twin Towers and the Pentagon.
Thanks to Jon Gold for this:
To a quick course on the shortest paths to 9/11 truth...
- The Two-Step 9/11 Truth Expedition: The demands on brain and heart
- The 911truth.org Mission: Where we are going with this and where we are not
- Wildlife to be Avoided: Note on some of our zanier friends along the way
Paths to 9/11 Understanding
I guess its not that people are afraid to talk, its that they are afraid of losing their jobs.
I work at the American society of civil engineer, an office which contributed massively at the NIST report. I work at the public relation department, so if I seem angry when I post, its because my *** is on the line; they want to shut down our department because of people like you who oppose the official version. Politicians don't want another scandal.
More war related then 9/11 related, however, you couldn't have had war without first having 9/11.
Some 60 years ago Arnold Toynbee concluded, in his monumental "Study of History," that the ultimate cause of imperial collapse was "suicidal statecraft." Sadly for George W. Bush's place in history and â€” much more important â€” ominously for America's future, that adroit phrase increasingly seems applicable to the policies pursued by the United States since the cataclysm of 9/11.
Reports from FEMA and NIST which attempt to explain how airplane impacts and the subsequent fires brought down the towers on 9/11 suffer from two major flaws. First of all, investigations by government agencies can hardly be considered independent; secondly, both documents attempt to explain the collapses based on the foregone conclusion that the airplanes impacted the towers creating a set of circumstances eventually resulting in their collapse. These reports concede that the collapses were not brought down by the impacts themselves nor the burning jet fuel, but rather by the resultant infernos which were responsible for weakening the structure of the towers causing their demise. Considering the fact that a third tower collapsed that day without suffering any airplane impact or jet fuel fire, the official story DEMANDS that plain old office fires caused the collapses, because if they didn't, the official story falls apart.
New DVD from Ruppert, coming soon:
More mainstream news!!! If your in the area, try to attend, and bring some of your uninformed buddies with you!
MANCHESTER â€” Professor emeritus David Ray Griffin will speak on "The Truth Behind 9/11 and American Empire: A Christian Theologian Speaks Out," at 7 p.m. Tuesday, Oct. 11, at Burr and Burton Academy's Riley Center.
Griffin is an internationally recognized theologian and author of a number of books, including "The New Pearl Harbor: Disturbing Questions About the Bush Administration and 9/11," and "The 9/11 Commission Report: Omissions and Distortions." He will also co-author "American Empire and A Better Possibility: A Political-Economic-Religious Statement," in 2006.
Fire and Policeman Uncovers Transit Authority Tapes Showing 'Heavy Smoke Condition' Below WTC On 9/11
Fireman's name is Isaac, possibly the same Isaac that stated half of the firefighters know 9/11 was an Inside Job. He might be silently organizing a coup within the fire department, lets hope so.
More evidence now surfaces indicating explosions rocked the WTC and a pre-planned controlled demolition.9 Oct 2005
By Greg Szymanski
More 9/11 evidence has surfaced indicating explosions rocked the North Tower prior to the jetliner striking the top floors, again showing the official government story is nothing more than a pack of lies.
Just got this email from Mujca coordinator Kevin Barrett. Anyone in Milwaukee should definitely go scope it out. Also be sure to tune into the radio interview of Gary Schmitt, is the Executive Director of the Project for a New American Century (PNAC), Monday at 3pm on Wisconsin Public Radio.
9/11 Terror Suspect to Speak at U.W.-Milwaukee
Citizens' Arrest in the Works?
The head of the terrorist organization suspected of planning the attacks of September 11th, 2001 will be speaking at the University of Wisconsin-Milwaukee this Tuesday, October 11th at 6:30 p.m., risking a citizens' arrest for 9/11 crimes against humanity. The terrorist chief will also be verbally pilloried by outraged citizens on the Ben Merens show Monday at 3 p.m. on Wisconsin Public Radio: http://www.wpr.org/webcasting/live.cfm
tvnewslies.org has posted an INN interview with William Rodriguez and Greg Syzmanski. This interview may be worth checking out for those unfamiliar with Rodriguez's claims of major explosions in the sub-basements of the WTC before the first plane impact.
An American hero A 20-year employee at one of the World Trade Center buildings hit on September 11, 2001, Rodriguez risked his life in saving many people and was honored for his heroism. And then Rodriguez testified in closed session to the official 9-11 commission (Kean-Zelikow), but his story of what happened that day the explosions in the sub-basements seconds before the plane hit, was suppressed by those whose task it is to cover-up what really happened. Special thanks to INNWorld Report for airing Rodriquez crucial evidence that exposes the Bush administrations lies.
As a result, people can see the evidence for themselves as it was originally reported by our corporate media who did not realize what they were exposing at the time! A CNN DVD called â€œAmerica Remembersâ€ was a main source of original footage for these documentaries. In at least one of the documentaries (In Plane Site) the director holds up a copy of this DVD and suggests that you acquire a copy and see the footage for yourself. This seems pretty open, honest and fair to me, because the filmmaker is not asking you to trust him; he is asking you to investigate his claims.
Got an email while I was out about a set of short videos called 'The Produced Reality' all about the 'collapses' of the twin towers and WTC7. The videos include footage from 9/11, eye witness reports, the Silverstein 'pull it' clip, and example controlled demolitions to compare with WTC7.
We are no longer alone!!! The truth is here, we are no longer on the fringe, we all have succeeded in getting these facts out in the open. This is mainstream people!!! Congratulations, we have come this far, but there is much further to go...
SITTING snugly at the corner of prosperity and lunacy, Brooklyn's Vox Pop cafe serves up piping-hot conspiracy theories about the 9/11 terror attacks, along with the coffee and scones.
The strikes on the World Trade Center? They were an "inside job" â€” either carried out by the United States government or allowed to occur so we might plunge into war. Or, it was the mother of all insurance scams. Take your pick.
Maybe now the firefighters will speak up. Thanks to Jon at www.yourbbsucks.com for this.
MONTCLAIR, N.J. -- The dust and debris that billowed into the air when the World Trade Center towers collapsed after the 9/11 terror attacks has had long-reaching detrimental health effects, most notably on firefighters, experts said.
More propaganda I suppose:
Washington : Former CIA official Michael Scheuer, who headed the â€œbin Laden unitâ€ in the intelligence agency, has said that though the Saudi-born fugitive was keeping a low profile, he was still powerful, and would remain in hiding until he staged another lethal attack on the US like 9/11.
â€œAs soon as he hits us in the US again, weâ€™ll see how important he is in the Islamic world. We mistake quiet for defeat or irrelevance.......and all quiet is disquiet,â€ The News quoted Scheuer, who retired in one year ago, as saying.