by Rena Patty
A highlight of our time in Whitefish was a radio interview set up by Pam that included Neils Harrit in Copenhagen, Richard Gage in California, Pam and myself in Whitefish, MT, hosted by Josef Hanji on a local Copenhagen radio station.
Another highlight was opportunity to meet with an architect who lives in Whitefish, Richard Smith, and discuss current events. Several of us watched the Experts Speak Out documentary together.
We can do radio interviews from the road by cell phone. You can help. Let your local radio station know about the unique opportunity to interview us from the road as we ride across the country to raise awareness for Architects & Engineers for 9/11 Truth. We'll invite one of the experts from Experts Speak Out to join the interview.
Last year in march we attented two meetings about 9/11 truth in Frankfurt, Germany.
I did post a short entry on blogger
Now we'd finished a german language documentary about it. Please share with all german natives you know.
Public Lecture - The Collapse of the Seventh Tower: A Physical & Chemical Analysis
Niels H. Harrit, Copenhagen University
When: Wednesday, November 16, 2011 @ 7:15-9:15 p.m.
Where: Morrison Hall 007
Departmental Sponsors: College of Arts and Sciences, American Studies Program
To most people, the image of the World Trade Center (WTC) is confined to the famous twin towers, which dominated the New York skyline until September 11th, 2001, when they collapsed after each one being hit by an airliner. However, the trade center was an assembly of seven buildings around a plaza. The youngest of these, WTC7, was a huge office building, reaching 186 meters and 47 stories into the air. The ground-plan area was little less than a soccer field.
WTC7 was not hit by an airliner. Still, it collapsed seven hours after the twin towers in a totally symmetric movement with free-fall speed. It was the most unexpected collapse in the history of modern building construction.
The talk outlines the factual circumstances around this event. These facts are held up against the official account of the event as it has been presented in a report from National Institute of Standards and Technology. According to this report, WTC7 collapsed due to fire. But never before - or since - in history has a steel-framed high-riser collapsed due to fire.
In the second part of the talk it is proposed that the collapse of WTC was due to controlled demolitions using explosives. In addition, unambiguous evidence points to the use of thermite, which is an energetic material used to cut and weld steel. The newest findings in the dust include still-reactive remains of so-called nano-thermite.
by Ron Brookman, S.E.
Thank you to Mickey Huff and KPFA radio for hosting the Twin Towers debate on the tenth anniversary of September 11. Richard Gage and Niels Harrit described hard evidence for the controlled-demolition hypothesis; Dave Thomas and Richard Muller promoted the fire-induced collapse hypothesis. Listen to the entire debate at http://www.kpfa.org/archive/id/73245.
Richard Gage, AIA is a San Francisco Bay Area architect and founder of AE911Truth—a nonprofit organization with over 1,600 professional architects and engineers plus over 13,000 others who are calling for a science-based investigation of the destruction of the three high-rise buildings.1
Dr. Niels Harrit, associate professor emeritus of chemistry from the University of Copenhagen, has published over 60 peer-reviewed papers in scientific journals including ''Active Thermitic Material Discovered in Dust from the 9/11 World Trade Center Catastrophe."2
A University class taught by Prof. Anthony J. Hall from McMaster University to Lethbridge University on March 2, 2011 using skype. The participants are listed in order of appearance:
Anthony J. Hall is a Professor at the University of Lethbridge (Alberta) where he is the Coordinator/Instructor of the interdisciplinary program of Globalization Studies. He received an Alberta Book Award in 2004 for "The American Empire and the Fourth World."
Joshua Blakeney is Dr. Hall's graduate student (MSc) and Media Coordinator of Globalization Studies at the University of Lethbridge. He is the recipient of the Queen Elizabeth II Graduate Scholarship to study the origins of the Global War on Terror.
Dr. Niels Harrit, Professor Emeritus of Chemistry at the University of Copenhagen, will be lecturing across Canada in six recognized locations. He will offer a critique of the official account of the destruction of the World Trade Center, focusing on Building 7. Widely published, he is the lead author of a 2009 article on the discovery of nano-thermite (an incendiary and explosive) in the WTC dust.
Tuesday February 22 @ 7PM, Edmonton Alberta
"Edmonton Questions 9/11"
For more info see: http://civilinformationactivism.org/Niels-Harrit.html
Thursday February 24 @ 7PM, University of British Columbia
Presentation: "Explosive Evidence"
For more info see: http://civilinformationactivism.org/Niels-Harrit.html
Saturday February 26 @ 7PM, University of Victoria
Presentation: "Explosive Evidence"
For more info see: http://civilinformationactivism.org/Niels-Harrit.html
Tuesday March 1 St. @ 7:30 PM, McMaster University, Hamilton Ontario
Presentation: "Reasonable Doubt: Science and the Collapse of World Trade 7 on September 11, 2001.”
For more info see: http://www.humanities.mcmaster.ca/~peace/
On June 10, 2010, Dr. Fahim Sadek of NIST (firstname.lastname@example.org), an investigator who produced the Bush Administration's report on the WTC, gave a lecture at the Engineering College of Aarhus on the entire WTC Investigation. This is apparently the only time that NIST has given a detailed talk on their entire investigation.
It was expected that Sadek would take questions at the end of the lecture. However, nobody was allowed to ask any. Nevertheless, before Sadek left, Dr. Niels Harrit managed to catch him for a brief talk.
Three months before on February 28th, 2010, Dr. Niels Harrit gave a presentation on the collapse of World Trade Center 7 in Aarhus, Denmark, as well. Hundreds of invitations were sent to both journalists, city council members and various members of the scientific community. More than 300 people attended, among them several professors from the Engineering College of Aarhus.
Despite prohibiting filming or any other documentation of Sadek's presentation, over an hour of video the presentation was pieced together from several hidden video- and sound recorders. This is that presentation and the Sadek-Harrit exchange.
Lately there was an arrest in Sweden of an alleged shooter or sniper who is suspicious to have killed someone. This man lived some time in the US, and, the swedish newspaper Expressen claims:
På nätet visade han också intresse för den danske forskaren Niels Harrit,
som hävdar att flera ton högteknologiska sprängmedel användes för att rasera
World Trade Center-skraporna.
On the net, he showed also interest in the Danish scientist Niels Harrit, who claim that several tonnes of high-tech explosives used to bring down the World Trade Center skyscrapers.
Not the first time for such a smear attempt, but certainly for Harrit.
9/11:EXPLOSIVE TESTIMONY EXCLUSIVE - Niels Harrit - Chemist
You may have noticed that the "Active Thermitic Material" paper by Niels Harrit, et al., along with other papers, has been missing from Bentham Open for more than a week. The paper is back, at a new URL: http://www.bentham.org/open/tocpj/articles/V002/7TOCPJ.pdf. Update your links!
AS THE DUST SETTLES... Danish Scientist Finds Evidence of Nano-Thermite in WTC dust. “Brought down by mixture of explosives"
I interviewed Dr. Neils Harrit, PhD from Copenhagen Denmark, on the ninth anniversary of the September 11th attacks, about his research and findings. Below this press release, you will find my interview.
"The Last Nail In the 9/11 Coffin" - Danish Scientist Links Evidence of Explosive Thermite to Ground Zero WTC Destruction
Press Conference Announcement
Scientists Link Explosive Thermite to 9/11/01 WTC Destruction
September 5th, 2010, by Shawn Hamilton, theswillbucket.com
Most observers consider the informal Coast to Coast “debate” between architect Richard Gage, chemist and scholar Niels Harrit, and physicists Dave Thomas and Kim Johnson to have been a success although who “won” depends largely on who you ask. The August 21st event, which was more of a conversation than a formal debate, explored what caused the destruction of the three World Trade Center buildings on September 11, 2001. Gage and Harrit argued that explosives destroyed the buildings while Thomas and Johnson reaffirmed the official explanation that office fires ultimately led to collapses.
Three Day in-depth report on 9/11 truth with Gary Null on Progressive Radio Network with record amount of listeners
Record Breaker! This week we broke the record for the amount of live listeners twice. Congratulations to Gary Null on breaking the record and thank you all for your continued support.
Here are the three radio-shows:
Today’s guest is Ian Henshall and he is a British based investigative journalist and author, whose book “9/11 Revealed: The New Evidence” has raised a lot of voice across Europe.
Also on the today’s program, is Professor Niels Harrit and he is an associate professor in the Chemistry Department at th University of Copenhagen, Denmark - where he has taught for the past 35 plus years.
Also on today’s program, is Professor Steve Jones and he is a professor emeritus in physics specializing in catalyzed fusion or cold nuclear fusion at Brigham Young University.
Today’s guest is Richard Gage and he is a San Francisco based architect and a member of the American Institute of Architects.
Wendsday 10th March 4:30pm at Copenhagen Universtity,CU.
A debate arranged by the influential Danish newspaper Politiken and CU labeled "One tower - two views". The topic in debate was the science behind 9/11, with the WTC7 collapse as pivotal subject.
The dueling banjos consisted of Niels+Harrit and Prof.of+Physics+at+Niels+Bohr+Institute+of+CU,+Per+Hedegaard.
Each had 20 minutes of solo presentation on the WTC7 collapse. This was followed by a debate between the duelers with questions from the audience.
French Journalists Interview Cynthia McKinney and Niels Harrit
This is something you have not yet seen in any US media. French independent media La Télé Libre interviews two of the most prominent 9/11 truth activists, Cynthia McKinney and Niels Harrit. To understand the context of the interview, you need to know what is happening in France right now, because 9/11 is surely becoming a hot topic.
France 2 Backs Away From Real Debate, censors Niels Harrit and Éric Laurent
This is an update of our previous article
Historic 9/11 Debate with Bigard, Laurent, Kassovitz and Harrit on French TV
Last weekend, from October 9 to 11, Debora Blake and Annie Machon organized “Vers La Vérité” in Paris, France. The event was sponsored in part by ReOpen911 France. “Vers La Vérité” was a mix of public and private events where each sub-event was designed to facilitate communication between people who share common concerns on important issues, including 9/11. It was not a 100% 9/11 Truth conference. The goal was to position 9/11 in the broader context of related and equally disturbing issues such as illegal wars and reduction of civil liberties.
They kicked off the event with a press conference on Friday morning attended by a journalist from a mainstream newspaper, France Soir and the independent TéléLibre. The mayor of Paris's second district introduced Cynthia who made a brief statement and took some questions. Annie Machon also spoke briefly.
Following the Vers La Vérité event in Paris on October 9-11, KPFK in Los Angeles will be interviewing organizers Annie Machon and Debora Blake tonight, Oct. 13 from 8 to 9 pm PST, 11pm East Coast, 5:15 Central Europe. To listen live, http://www.kpfk.org/listen-live.html
Cynthia McKinney, keynote speaker at Vers La Vérité, led the discussion with Annie and Debora.
Link to archive audio file of the broadcast
The Russia Today delivered us some interviews and reports about 9/11 the last weeks, e.g. an interview with Kevin Barrett,
but also a report about our march in New York.
What I disovered by coincidence is the four-part report about 9/11, which looks like an excellent reading.
In the I. part is a hint that the RT does an exclusive interview with Niels Harrit, the lead author of the nanothermite-paper.
This looks to be a very interesting night in Paris.
Niels Harrit: Professor Pileni's Resignation as Editor-in-Chief of the Open Chemical Physics Journal
Professor Pileni's Resignation as Editor-in-Chief of the Open Chemical Physics Journal
By Niels Harrit
After the paper entitled "Active Thermitic Material Discovered in Dust from the 9/11 World Trade Center Catastrophe," which I along with eight colleagues co-authored, was published in the Open Chemical Physics Journal, its editor-in-chief, Professor Marie-Paule Pileni, abruptly resigned. It has been suggested that this resignation casts doubt on the scientific soundness of our paper.
However, Professor Pileni did the only thing she could do, if she wanted to save her career. After resigning, she did not criticize our paper. Rather, she said that she could not read and evaluate it, because, she claimed, it lies outside the areas of her expertise.
But that is not true, as shown by information contained on her own website (http://www.sri.jussieu.fr/pileni.htm). Her List of Publications reveals that Professor Pileni has published hundreds of articles in the field of nanoscience and nanotechnology. She is, in fact, recognized as one of the leaders in the field. Her statement about her ”major advanced research” points out that, already by 2003, she was ”the 25th highest cited scientist on nanotechnology” (http://www.sri.jussieu.fr/pileni.htm).
Transcript and Description:
Direct link to smear job- leave a comment: http://www.opednews.com/articles/911-NanoTech-Thermite-Publ-by-John-R-Mo...
See this link for hyperlinks in my post:
Dr. Moffett Smears ‘Active Thermitic’ Paper by Association- Again
In another headlined article at OpEdNews.com, Sr. Editor Dr. Moffett has again smeared the peer-reviewed paper, Active Thermitic Material Discovered in Dust from the 9/11 World Trade Center Catastrophe published in The Open Chemical Physics Journal, published by Bentham.org. A different Bentham.org journal, The Open Information Science Journal, recently published a hoax paper, and 2 editors resigned: Open Access Publisher Accepts Nonsense Manuscript for Dollars. See Dr. Moffett’s previous smear job rebutted by Dr. Michael Green, here: Pardon Our Dust, or, Why the World Trade Center Dust Matters. See Dr. Moffett’s current smear job here: 911 NanoTech Thermite Publisher Accepts Fake Paper, Editors quit
I find some areas of agreement with Dr. Moffet; for instance, he says: "The only way to find out what really happened [on 9/11] is to have a large panel of independent researchers reopen the case, with access to the classified documents that would be needed to make a valid assessment of all the data."
From Fred Mann;
On May 7, 2009 Professor David Ray Griffin came to Lucerne Switzerland on his tour through Europe that took him to Paris, Brussels and Madrid, and several other cities for an evening under the motto: “9/11 Time for a second look”.
As a leading figure in the world wide 9/11 truth movement it was an honor to welcome him and listen to his speech, live and in person. At the same time I grabbed the opportunity because of the currentness of the topic and also invited Professor Dr. Niels Harrit to our event, who published together with eight other scientists their paper about nano-thermite that they found in the dust of ground zero. That both respected personalities would inform us in the same evening was a special experience.
(SnowCrash has updated this blog entry with some very interesting background information on Ms. Pileni... kicking it up to the front page for review. -rep.) (Another good update on this blog today, below the red "Update" text - kicking back up to the top. Originally posted 2009-04-29 - rep.)
The editor in chief of the journal where recently the paper: "Active Thermitic Material Discovered in Dust from the 9/11 World Trade Center Catastrophe" was published, resigned, claiming she wasn't informed of the publication. She proceeds to provide not a single solid scientific rebuttal, only administrative bickering and personal political bias against, well.. inconvenient science. One particularly notable comment attributed to Ms. Pileni is this one: "Marie-Paule Pileni points out that because the topic lies outside her field of expertise, she cannot judge whether the article in itself is good or bad.".
Strangely, her areas of research seem to contradict that. I'll quote you an excerpt of her resume:
1990-1992: Chairperson on workshops related to the French Defense research.
1989-1992: Consultant at the Minister of Recherche concerning the National Defense 1989: Member of the “Institut des Hautes Etudes de Défense Européenne”.
1987-1988: Member of the ’“Institut des Hautes Etudes de Défense Nationale” (IHEDN)1984-1986: Member of National exam in Chemistry
EDITORIAL BOARD MEMBERSHIP
2006: Accounts of Chemical Research, American Chemical Society.
Journal of experimental nanosciences, Publisher Taylor&Francis.
2002: Journal of Physical Chemistry, Board member, American Chemical Society.
1990-1994: Société Nationale des Poudres et Explosifs, SNPE, France (Literally translated: National Society of Powders and Explosives)
2001: Laboratoire des matériaux mésoscopiques et nanomètriques, LM2N.
1992-2000: Structure et réactivité des systèmes interfaciaux, SRI. (Literally translated: Structure and reactivity of interfacial systems)
The excellent work by Niels Harrit, Farrer, Jones and Ryan et. al in the recent journal article (Thermitic Material Discovered in WTC Dust) has paved the way for some very good media coverage in Denmark. At around 10:30 pm on Monday April 6, Harrit was interviewed for 10 minutes during the late news program on one of the two most respected Danish television channels (TV2). On Wednesday April 8, Harrit was interviewed for 6 minutes at 8:45 am during a live news and entertainment program on the same channel. In both cases, Harrit, and the claims of the article, were treated with refreshing seriousness and respect.
The first interview has been subtitled in English and loaded onto youtube (direct+link), and should appear (embedded) below: