August 2006

(For a historical archive of our old site visit http://911blogger.com/archive)

Shock Muse From the U.S.

http://www.sundaymail.co.uk/news/tm_objectid=17634099&method=full&siteid=64736&headline=shock-muse-from-the-us--name_page.html

...

"Are we really supposed to believe that a man in a cave in Afghanistan managed to orchestrate the most unbelievable attack on the United States of all time?

"I think 9/11 was definitely an inside job done by a group of high-powered people looking for an excuse to invade the Middle East for oil and other natural resources.

"I think America needed another Pearl Harbor-type event in order to invade Iraq. It gave the US and UK governments the perfect excuse to go to war."

...

Advertisement
function Ads_PopUp() {} Falk AdSolution

Thanks to Monte for sending this in.

Bin Laden, Most Wanted For Embassy Bombings?

The question is, why hasn't he been indicted? According to this, OBL was indicted for a terrorist attack in 1999, but they can't be bothered to indict him for 9/11? The largest attack ever on U.S. soil, responsible for 2 wars and countless more in the future? Thanks to Michael, Ray, and Truth01 for sendin this in:

http://www.washingtonpost.com/wp-dyn/content/article/2006/08/27/AR2006082700687.html

Al-Qaeda leader Osama bin Laden is a longtime and prominent member of the FBI's "Ten Most Wanted" list, which notes his role as the suspected mastermind of the deadly U.S. embassy bombings in East Africa on Aug. 7, 1998. But another more infamous date -- Sept. 11, 2001 -- is nowhere to be found on the same FBI notice.

The curious omission underscores the Justice Department's decision, so far, to not seek formal criminal charges against bin Laden for approving al-Qaeda's most notorious and successful terrorist attack. The notice says bin Laden is "a suspect in other terrorist attacks throughout the world" but does not provide details.

Mary Maxwell, 9/11 Truth Candidate

http://gaelicstarover.blogspot.com/2006/08/mary-maxwell-phd.html

Republican Congressional Candidate, Author and Political Scientist, Dr. Mary Maxwell has responded to my earlier post

"I doubt that Sen Gregg actually said that. No New Hampshire Republican would take such a position against the Constitution. More likely, the words were supplied by the editor of The Union Leader (also known locally as The Management Follower). I believe many quotes in newspapers are written without benefit of a telephone call to the speaker. In any case I suspect that the episode of the professor would not have made the news (after all it is not an event) but for the fact that I am running for Congress here in New Hampshire, and on Thursday another paper came out with the jaw-dropper that I had labeled 9/11 a false flag operation. I am indeed proud of the Nashua Telegraph for letting me say my piece..."

Click here for more information about Dr. Maxwell's Congressional campaign.

American 77 Final Maneuver

This is the final maneuver performed by the aircraft which hit the Pentagon on September 11, 2001. This animation was provided by the NTSB and is accurate in terms of the flight data recorder on board this aircraft. It has not been altered by anyone after it was received from the NTSB. Whether or not this animation is authentic, i defer inquiry to the NTSB. Please pay attention to the end of the video, as the altitude is too high to have hit the light poles that were reported to have been struck by the same aircraft which hit the pentagon. The video comment inserts are provided by an experienced Airline pilot.

http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=DzR-q0ijbV0 

Busted, Again Bush is Two Times a Criminal

For the second time in two months, a federal court has ruled that the president is in violation of the Constitution. This time it's a federal court in Detroit that has ruled that President Bush has violated the Fourth Amendment against illegal search and seizure for his order to the National Security Agency to monitor the phone and Internet messages of Americans without bothering to obtain a court order based upon probable cause.
The first time, it was the U.S. Supreme Court, which ruled in late June that the president had violated the Constitution by asserting he had the power to ignore the Third Geneva Convention on Treatment of Prisoners of War-a treaty formally signed into law by the U.S. and made an integral part of the U.S. Criminal Code.
The important thing about these two rulings--and it is a point that the complicit mainstream media have shied away from mentioning--is that they both are declaring the president to be a criminal. That is, he has been found in the first case to be in criminal violation of the Constitution, as well as the Foreign Intelligence Surveillance Act of 1978, and in the second, he has been found to be in violation of U.S. and International Law.

Just checking in..

I've been out the majority of this weekend, so I just wanted to check in..

First, on Friday I fixed the RSS feeds, they should be working fine now..

Second, despite higher than average usage this weekend we managed to only have 1 CPU quota error since Friday at 2PM.. Looks like a few changes I made actually made a difference.. The one CPU quota error we did have occurred because of a backup I was doing while the site was running.. I also tracked down a pretty big cause of the CPU overhead, I will try to get that taken care of this week just in case.. Basically the code I wrote to insert date headers on the main page is wasting a good bit of CPU, so worse comes to worse we can loose the date headers and that will get rid of a lot of the CPU overhead..

I hope this week to get into researching an appropriate ratings/voting/user points/karma system.. Maybe I can get that done in a week or two if things go well.. Also, we have gotten an incredibly nice offer for a site theme redesign, and from what I have seen so far I am very very impressed. Hopefully we can unveil this in a month or so..

I've been having some serious back issues this weekend - probably from working on this site so much last week - so I may be in and out depending on how that goes..

Then, They Came for the Professors.

UPDATE, email addresses and websites to allow you to support William Woodward here:
http://www.yourbbsucks.com/forum/showpost.php?p=68070&postcount=156


http://gaelicstarover.blogspot.com/2006/08/then-they-came-for-professors.html

Truth needs no laws to defend it. The 9/11 Commission Report is an affront to many non-Kool-Aid-imbibing Americans, yet we already paid for it!

A few months ago, Professor Kevin Barrett was threatened for questioning the officially-approved conspiracy theory. It must be open-season on professors.

We would to well to consider the haunting words of Pastor Martin Niemöller.

If we don't stop this now, all of us will be required to subscribe to all lies spewed by this miserable and vicious Administration.

Note, check out the response to the William Woodward news here:
http://www.unionleader.com/article.aspx?headline=New+Hampshire+readers+speak+out+on+Prof.+Woodward+and+9%2F11&articleId=68affc3b-a449-4da5-95be-71d1aecbed6e

Can Anything Be Done?

http://informationclearinghouse.info/article14718.htm

Many readers have praised me for my courage in broaching taboo subjects and stating obvious truths. Others denounce me for “being unpatriotic and distrusting our government.” One reader, Susan Hartman, wrote to me that I was obviously in the pay of Islamic Jihadists and that she had reported me to the FBI.

Despite the lack of evidence to support their belief, a number of readers remain confident that Saddam Hussein had weapons of mass destruction and that America narrowly missed being annihilated. These readers know for a fact that Hussein had WMD, because “the President would know, and he wouldn’t lie.”
...
For reporting a scientific finding, I was called a “conspiracy theorist.” Only in America is scientific analysis seen as conspiracy theory and government lies as truth.

Applications of the laws of physics and scientific calculations can be reviewed and checked by other scientists. Scientists, like the rest of us, can make mistakes. However, questions raised about the collapse of the WTC buildings are not engaged but ignored.

The 9/11 scholars findings seem to be in sync with public opinion. Polls show that more than one-third and as much as one-half of the American public does not believe the government’s 9/11 story.
...
My point is a simple one. Attentive people, even if they are not scientifically literate, can sense when there are too many oddities for an explanation to be believable.

If deception is sensed, there is a receptive audience when experts or film makers speak. Denouncing inconvenient facts as “conspiracy theories” is a way of suppressing debate and investigation.
...

The Patriot Party Begins

The Patriot Party is dedicated to the lives lost on 9/11 and the lives we continue to lose in an unjust war. The main purpose of this site is to defend our rights against our government and it's methodical destruction of our Constitution. ''We The People'' speak here. We will post our comments, links, and real news in hopes of reaching out to as many people as we can to educate them about the elitist group who are responsible for the attacks on 9/11. Among them are President George W. Bush, Vice-President Dick Cheney, Secretary Of Defense Donald H. Rumsfeld and former-President George H.W. Bush, Sr.

The Patriot Party:
1.Stands together united in one belief. The belief that ''We The People'' own America.
2. Will expose elected officials, big corporations and their business partners of their lies and will invite debates if challenged on any subject especially the conspiracy of 9/11.
3. Believes in voting with their conscious and keeping a close eye on candidates who switch views or support the war in Iraq.
4. Demands the 9/11 Commission be reopened, restructured and embodied with representatives of the peoples choice.
5. Calls for the immediate impeachment of President George W. Bush, Vice-President Dick Cheney and their entire cabinet.

A Challenge To Nico and All "No-Planers"

Dear Nico and all proponents of the "no-planes" theory:

I challenge you, once and for all, to show clear, concise proof of your claims. NOT diverse, disjointed links, NOT obscure, unproven claims about particular videos, but an easy to read and understand presentation. EVERYTHING I've seen posted on this subject has been vague, disjointed, headache producing... in a word, DISTRACTING.

I propose that, if none of you can meet this challenge to the satisfaction of the majority of the members of 911Blogger, that you be prevented from continuing to make what I believe are divisive and ultimately, destructive claims at 911Blogger. I further propose that the above challenge be met within the next 7 days.

Perhaps a poll could be created for this purpose. If members agree with the above proposal, please reply (additional suggestions are welcome).

RSS