May 2007
(For a historical archive of our old site visit http://911blogger.com/archive)
Guiliani Disqualifies Himself As Presidential Hopeful
Source: blogcritics.org
Written by Mike Green
Published May 22, 2007
The recent exchange between Republican presidential hopefuls Rudy Guiliani of New York and Ron Paul of Texas ought to serve as a metaphor for what's wrong with the political process in this nation. The two were addressing the attacks of 9/11 — the elephant that has lumbered around America for nearly six years while leaders have long sought to ignore it.
The simple discourse revealed enormous complexities.
Paul: "They attack us because we've been over there. We've been bombing Iraq for 10 years. We've been in the Middle East."
An angry Guiliani responded that as someone who lived through the attack of September 11 — “that we invited the attack because we were attacking Iraq — I don't think I've ever heard that before, and I've heard some pretty absurd explanations for September 11th. ... I would ask the congressman to withdraw that comment and tell us that he didn't really mean that."
Michelle Malkin a 9/11 Truther? LOL
I picked up this 2002 Michelle Malkin article over at LCF posted by forum member Sureshot, who found it posted over at MichelleMalkinIsAnIdiot.com. Enjoy!
Jewish World Review March 8, 2002 / 24 Adar, 5762
Michelle Malkin
Just wondering
http://www.NewsAndOpinion.com -- THE six-month anniversary of the Sept. 11 terrorist attacks is upon us. Here are a half-dozen unsolved mysteries still on my mind:
What really happened on United Airlines Flight 93?
Is It Just Me?
Or are you feeling a strange desire to let Nancy know what's on your mind? Anybody with me?
For the sake of objectivity
I want to draw attention to a study done by Protec, a demolition firm who took it upon themselves to study the possibility of demolitions being used on 9/11. And although it concludes that it was unlikely demolitions were used, I find its arguements compelling. In fact, out of all the studies done i.e. popular mechanics, FEMA, and NIST, I find it to be the most crediable. I think it is important for us to look at all aspects of this debate even if they do not agree with our own assertions. I urge the 911 truth community to not practice what we condemn and denounce this study as rubbish without ever having read it. We jump all over people who dismiss our questions without ever having looked at the information. So for the sake of objectivity won't you please read the study.
http://www.implosionworld.com/Article-WTC%20STUDY%208-06%20w%20clarif%20as%20of%209-8-06%20.pdf
Thank you and may the truth reveal itself once and for all!
Respectfully,
John D. Briggs II
Portland, OR David Ray Griffin speech went very well tonight
Just a little note to say the event came off quite well and I had a great time afterward meeting no less than 5 of my online "people"! Col. Jenny, Casseia (did I spell that right??), LeftWright, Ken Jenkins and Alex Ansary were all subjected to my 9/11-event-noobie-ness and all were as nice as could be. Sadly my ride had to leave so I couldn't attend the after-event party but other than that it was just what I'd hoped for. Kudos to all for putting on an excellent event, and of course thanks to DRG for continuing to speak the truth about the event which supposedly "changed everything" -- but which we aren't supposed to examine.
Networking through Myspace to reach more people
I have recently created a Myspace Group page. Please give me your suggestions on video or quotes I should add to my page. This will be used to try and awaken some of the people I hold dearest to me in my life, as well as others I have never met. You can see why I would want it to be very effective.
Dr. Bob Bowman Answers a Few Questions Regarding a New Investigation into 9/11
During Dr. Bowman's 2007 Patriot Tour stop in San Diego, CA, I had the privilege to meet and ask Dr. Bowman a few questions regarding a new investigation into the 9/11 tragedy. Here are his responses:
Giuliani in Vermont and New Hampshire - May 23rd
Rudy Giuliani
Events on May 23, 2007
7:30 a.m., Speech in White River Junction, VT.
10:30 a.m., Meeting in Claremont, NH.
12:30 p.m., Town Hall in Keene, NH.
Just sayin'... would make a great Truth Squad event.
Bush Anoints Himself as the Insurer of Constitutional Government in Emergency
http://progressive.org/mag_wx051807
Bush Anoints Himself as the Insurer of Constitutional Government in Emergency
By Matthew Rothschild
May 18, 2007
With scarcely a mention in the mainstream media, President Bush has ordered up a plan for responding to a catastrophic attack.
In a new National Security Presidential Directive, Bush lays out his plans for dealing with a “catastrophic emergency.”
Under that plan, he entrusts himself with leading the entire federal government, not just the Executive Branch. And he gives himself the responsibility “for ensuring constitutional government.”
He laid this all out in a document entitled “National Security Presidential Directive/NSPD 51” and “Homeland Security Presidential Directive/HSPD-20.”
The White House released it on May 9.
Other than a discussion on Daily Kos led off by a posting by Leo Fender, and a pro-forma notice in a couple of mainstream newspapers, this document has gone unremarked upon.
The subject of the document is entitled “National Continuity Policy.”