investigation

U.S. Senator Supports a New 9/11 Investigation

Senator also wants to see recent study confirming explosives in the debris of the World Trade Center as Fox News propagandizes the report.

By Manny Badillo, nephew of Thomas Joseph Sgroi, written on 06/03/09

NEW YORK, NY -- New York's junior Senator Kirsten Gillibrand fully supports the victims’ family members, hero first responders, and all New Yorkers pursuit of justice concerning the events of Sept. 11th, 2001.

Filling the Senate seat of Secretary Hillary Clinton, Sen. Gillibrand is one of the first in Congress to speak publicly about her commitment to finding out what really happened during the unsolved mass murder of innocents close to eight years ago in New York, Washington, and Pennsylvania.

After hearing of the recent peer-reviewed and refereed study, which found explosives in the debris of the world trade center, Sen. Gillibrand said, “ “Based on what you’ve just told me, and that 70% of family members questions were not answered during the commission hearings, I think those questions should be answered.”

Senator for New 911 Investigation

> ~~~~~~~~~~~~~~::::::::::::::::::::::::::::
> S O M E O F T H E A B O V E N E W S
> ====================::::::::::::::::::::::
> ~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~::::::::::::
> ===================================:::::::
> Please post and forward as appropriate
> ++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++
> ~-~-~-~-~-~-~-~-~-~-~-~-~-~-~-~-~-~-~-~-~-
> ==========================================
============================================
A new species is arising on the planet.
It is arising now, and it is you.
```Eckhart Tolle
============================================
============================================

FROM:
WeAreChange:
New York Senator Gillibrand Supports New 9/11 Investigation May 30, 2009

This video was premiered on our new live video show http://www.mogulus.com/wearechangelive [1] its rebroadcasting right now.

Tune in every Sunday 3pm eastern to get the latest CHANGE news from Robert Wanik and Luke Rudkowski live.

http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=msGxrHISayI

Source URL:
http://www.911blogger.com/node/20246
Links:
[1] http://www.mogulus.com/wearechangelive

Turley: 'God help us' if torture only gets a '9/11 commission'

"God help us if the only thing we get out of this is a commission modeled on 9/11," Turley commented. "That was a commission that was really made for Washington -- a commission composed of political appointees of both parties that ran interference for those parties -- a commission that insisted at the beginning it would not impose blame on individuals. So it's the ideal Washington commission -- a commission that would investigate without any reprecussions."

http://rawstory.com/news/2008/Turley_Torture_investigations_should_look_at_0422.html
Turley: 'God help us' if torture only gets a '9/11 commission'
David Edwards and Muriel Kane
Published: Wednesday April 22, 2009

The recent release of Bush administration torture memos has given rise to calls for prosecution of the Justice Department lawyers who wrote those memos. However, law professor Jonathan Turley believes that this may represent a deliberate attempt to draw attention away from George Bush, Dick Cheney, and the other high Bush administration officials who ordered the torture.

Fort Detrick disease samples may be missing


Fort Detrick is where, some people believe AIDS virus was 'created' and had some connection with that anthrax incidents happened right after 9/11.

Don't know what kind of 'samples' are missing this time...
But surely, this is not a good news.

Will this investigation achieve its goal?
Or will it fail just like the 9/11 Commission and so many others?
_________________________________________________

Fort Detrick disease samples may be missing
Originally published April 22, 2009
By Justin M. Palk
News-Post Staff

What sort of investigation do we want into 9/11?

As a sort of poll and as an exercise to see how creative the movement can be thinking up solutions, what sort of investigation do you think we need in order to get the truth about 9/11. Please be specific about who will do the investigation, where the investigation will take place (i.e. in what kind of courtroom) and how will the investigator get at the truth. You can leave your answers as comments to this post. You can also vote up ideas you like and ideas you dislike.

Me personally I am divided on the issue. Part of me wants an independent investigator in a court of law, like William Pepper, to have subpoena power over the likes of Larry Silverstein, Dick Cheney and Buzzy Krongard, and I would like to see all of them executed for their treason.

Politicized Justice Department Firings Are Not the Only Investigation Needed by Margie Burns

Other articles by Margie Burns:

Why did Bush abolish information sharing and route all national security information to him, via Condoleezza Rice? (This one is not available anymore at onlinejournal.com, and at the moment is not available at archive.org either. I couldn't find the entire text anywhere online, though a number of blogs linked to the now dead link. This is a great example of why it's a good habit to take a sec, hit ctrl+s and save any important story you see to your hard drive- storage keeps getting bigger and cheaper. Nafeez Ahmed quotes from this article in The War on Truth (247-250)
http://web.archive.org/web/*/http:/www.onlinejournal.com/Special_Reports/080203Burns/080203burns.html

9/11 and the ‘second Pearl Harbor’
http://onlinejournal.com/artman/publish/article_78.shtml

TRIMMING THE BUSHES: Family Business at the Watergate
http://www.washingtonspectator.com/articles/20050215bushes_1.cfm

Latest article:

Politicized Justice Department Firings Are Not the Only Investigation Needed by Margie Burns on Thu 05 Mar 2009 11:28 AM EST
http://www.margieburns.com/blog/_archives/2009/3/5/4113130.html

Change.org Censors 9/11 Truth

Censored Idea

news.ReOpen911.info by Spotless Mind
Translated by DJDaveMark
December 1st, 2008

The administrators at Change.org have deleted the idea for a new investigation into 9/11.

They declared that a new investigation into the attacks – which gave the Bush Administration the power to spy on it's own citizens, to torture, to launch two preventative wars based on lies and more generally to trample all over the Constitution – was "outside the scope" of the site's stated mission and therefore didn't meet their criteria for "specific policy solutions". It doesn't matter how many people want to know the Truth about 9/11, they refuse to have the idea promoted and discussed on their site.

Because of this censorship, the Change.org site has shown that it isn't a "social platform" but, rather, just another gatekeeper of 9/11 Truth.

When the idea was pulled, it was by far the most popular, comfortably occupying the top spot, totaling at least 660 votes (twice the amount of the next best rated idea) only 48 hours after being submitted. On a side note, the other proposed ideas had a 3 week head start, and the 9/11 Truth idea was only just warming up.

Why (pretend to) ask the citizens for ideas then simply delete the most popular? It seems like all of this is more of a joke than a wishful expression for democracy…

Here is the e-mail received by everyone who voted (and to whom we thank for voting):

HOW TO PREVENT A CONSPIRACY THEORY by Michael Burgwin

Let's put an end to these conspiracy theories once and for all: a full investigation with persons of interest like Bush, Cheney, Rice and Rumsfeld, and whistleblowers like Sibel Edmonds and the NSWBC.org testifying in public under Oath
http://www.justacitizen.com

9/11 Commission Records:
http://www.archives.gov/research/9-11-commission/
In accordance with the Federal Records Act, the Commission has established a general restriction from public access on these records until 2009. Because the Commission was part of the legislative branch, its records are not subject to the Freedom of Information Act (FOIA).

HOW TO PREVENT A CONSPIRACY THEORY by Michael Burgwin
http://www.helium.com/items/189541-911-pentagon-theories-there-is-no-conspiracy

"Sometimes paranoia's just having all the facts." - William S. Burroughs

HistoryCommons.org - 2001 Anthrax Timeline Updated

hyperlinks: http://911reports.wordpress.com/2008/09/15/historycommonsorg-2001-anthrax-timeline-updated/

Article by Erik Larson

The 2001 Anthrax Attacks Timeline at HistoryCommons.org (aka CooperativeResearch.org) has been moved from The Complete 9/11 Timeline to the main Timelines page, and updated with the recent developments regarding the FBI’s Anthrax investigations. New entries include the clearing of Steven Hatfill, the death of Bruce Ivins and the FBI’s case against him, and the objections and questions being raised by experts, mainstream media and critics, and members of Congress. The 2001 Anthrax Attacks Timeline now has nearly 200 unique entries, and like all the Timelines at HistoryCommons.org, it will continue to grow as new and old information comes out.

911/ Truth, Part 2- The 9/11 Truth Movement: Independent Investigations, Media, Advocacy & Activism

Thought of a name i can live with and launched my own blog for 9/11 and related stuff at wordpress.com. It definitely needs a less generic look, but i'm just learning how to use wordpress, never had a blog before. In case you missed this from Arabesque:

A 9/11/2008 Resolution: Start Your Own 9/11 Blog!
http://arabesque911.blogspot.com/2008/08/911-activists-start-your-own-911-blog.html

9/11 Truth, Part 2 - 911Reports.com

http://911reports.wordpress.com/2008/08/13/911-truth-part-2-the-911-truth-movement-independent-investigations-media-advoca...

This article presents an overview of some of the many people, media and organizations that have documented and publicized contradictions and lies about 9/11, and contributed to the growing awareness of the falsity of the official 9/11 story. The decentralized and spontaneously growing collective of people demanding truth and justice has become known as the 9/11 Truth Movement.

911/ Truth, Part 2- The 9/11 Truth Movement: Independent Investigations, Media, Advocacy & Activism

Happy Birthday, America by John Kusumi (No vote w/o 9/11 Investigation)

Good points about boycotting in the article; excerpt about only supporting candidates that embrace and endorse 9/11 investigation:

The only way that Barack Obama can get my vote is if he (a.) rejects and denounces his association with Wesley Clark; (b.) embraces and endorses the impeachment of George W. Bush; and (c.) embraces and endorses a new investigation of the 9/11 attacks.

The only way that John McCain can get my vote is if he (a.) rejects and denounces trade deals which enlarge the U.S. trade deficit; (b.) embraces and endorses the impeachment of George W. Bush; and (c.) embraces and endorses a new investigation of the 9/11 attacks. Based on his trade policy, I might nickname him to be "Wrong Way McCain." That is based on his trade policy. So yes, I do have my differences with John McCain, but those are based on policy and not on denigrating his military service. His military service is one of the most honorable and heroic aspects of John McCain.

FIREFIGHT: Inside the Battle to Save the Pentagon on 9/11

Book review: Firefighters at the Pentagon, public records, 150 interviews with participants and eye-witnesses... anyone reading this?

"It took five years for authors Patrick Creed, a volunteer firefighter and Army officer, and Rick Newman, a writer for U.S. News and World Report, to pull together this story. Combing public records and conducting 150 interviews, Creed and Newman have done a monumental reporting job. Firefight tells the tale moment by moment through the accounts of dozens of participants and eye-witnesses. The book needed an editor with a sharper blue pencil -- it's too long, and the writing can be monotonous. Not unlike the heroes whose stories they tell, however, Creed and Newman faced a daunting challenge, rose to the occasion and rescued a piece of history from the ashes."

Reviewed by John N. Maclean
Sunday, June 1, 2008; Page BW02
FIREFIGHT: Inside the Battle to Save the Pentagon on 9/11
By Patrick Creed and Rick Newman
Ballantine. 486 pp. $27

Resurrecting the Original Scholars 9/11 Petition to the US Senate and Congress


Helping Researchers Obtain Required Information Concerning the 9/11 Attacks


In 2006, prior to the "necessary" split in the Scholars for 9/11 Truth group, there was an online petition that was to be sent to ALL members of the US Senate and Congress.

The target amount of signatures is 10,000 and the petition is currently located at :

http://www.thepetitionsite.com/takeaction/929981172

Naomi Wolf - "There hasen't been a real investigation of 9/11."

"it's bad to have an untouchable area ( 9/11 questions ) in a democracy,." - Naomi Wolf

I know some of you have attacked her for not taking a solid 9/11 truth position,. however I belive that by not taking such a position she is reaching more people that would simple dismiss such a decided position and is indeed getting them to think about 9/11 and question it.

What are your thought?

CIT to make important research trip to Arlington this weekend.

My partner Aldo and I will be in Arlington from Thursday Nov 1st through Monday Nov 5th.

We have some important interviews lined up and will be continuing our investigation.

As a simple precaution we are making our trip public knowledge.

We have no reason to expect any problems and although some will accuse us of being paranoid or seeking attention by posting this information we are not concerned with ridicule from detractors and have determined it best to make our trip known.

Thanks for your support and we look forward to sharing with you the information we uncover.

Sincerely.
Craig Ranke
CIT