Watch on Google Video here

(Excerpt from "Words on a page" blog)

Believe me my friends we are in trouble.

The plane evaporated, but they found Al-Queda's passports in the rubble?

In the quest for domination, all empires crumble.

I know, I know. I can hear you laughing.

The Pentagon envisioned the attack, a year before it happened.

Have your doubts still?

FEMA was in New York, on Sep 10th, for a "Bio-Terrorism Drill"

Its time for us all to take the Red Pill.

Its hard to conceive, but history is chilling.

In 1962, the U.S Government planned to fly our own planes into our own buildings

and blame Cuba for the killings.

It was to be a national disaster, to rally support for the overthrow of Castro.

The 3 buildings that collapsed on 9/11 due to "fire"

Were purchased by Larry Silverstein 6 weeks prior.

What is my point, then?

Larry Silverstein was not in his office in the North Tower on 9/11.

http://www.bloglines.com/blog/ewing2001
September 15, 2006

Vermont Guardian about new Griffin Book
NY Villager about Grannies protest meeting NY 9/11 Truth "members"
Concord Monitor: We must examine other theories about 9/11
Larry Bensky attacks 9/11 Truth Movement on KPFA
MEMRI video about 9/11 conspiracy remarks
Frontpage Mag: CBC’s 9/11 Slanders
Claim: Most Canadians Doubt 9/11 Conspiracy
40% of Danish People believe U.S. behind 9/11
Video Podcast: Scheer on 9/11
Lev Grossman friend: Why the 9/11 Conspiracy Theories Really Won't Go Away
eric Boehlert: Why Was Wolfowitz So Clueless On The Morning of 9/11?
New Debate Over Pentagon 9/11 Photo
"founding fathers of NY911Truth.. no longer welcome"
New GZ report + pics from protest
Skeptics Society: The 9/11 Truth Movement in Perspective
McKinney's Congressional Briefing Transcript Now Available
Czech Hit Piece: "The Conspiracy of the 9/11."
Killtown on WING TV (archived link)
Dutch News + Blogs about Daan de Wit + 09/16 Conference
No $2B Bid for 9/11 heroes
09/15 -Counterpunch: 9/11: In Theory and in Fact
Swiss "Blick" paper about swiss 9/11 Skeptics

To my dear fellow citizens:

I write you to let you know what I have realized of all the information flowing around either for us or against us. The latest I’ve seen is letters by US embassies trying to defend the official story to all foreign countries. They try to validate the official story by pointing out the 9-11 commission, which by the way lasted 1 year and a half( I just can't believe Clinton sex case deserved more time and a budget of 100 million dollars, compare to the death of 3000 people witch was given a budget of about 15 million dollars.) They refer to the NIST investigation, which they claim did extensive research, analyzed 7000 pieces of video, had 200 or more pieces of steel samples and debris from the WTC towers(by the way, where are the samples that they use?, also most of the plane fuel burned in the massive fireball outside the towers, fires burned from less than an hour at temperatures that could not melt the steel found days after the collapse, they do not take into account the grade of steel used, which can withstand fires of the like of kerosene for several hours even with its fireproof removed, they also claim the towers had its steel columns which hold lateral load sheared off by a 757 and its vertical load bearing columns removed by the impact of the airliner, and that being enough proof(according to them)for the towers to collapse.)

Protecting the 9-11 Patsies: Order W199I-WF-213589

http://search.yahoo.com/search?p=W199I-WF-213589&fr=yfp-t-500&toggle=1&cop=&ei=UTF-8

The following is a collection of links related to W199I; a presidential directive forcing the FBI to "back off" the
bin Laden family in pre-911 terrorism investigations.

http://freedom4um.com/cgi-bin/readart.cgi?ArtNum=12165

US agents told to "back off" Bin Ladens (ANANOVA)

Bush Thwarted FBI probe against Bin Ladens (AFP)

FBI told to "back off" investigating Bin Laden family before the attacks on Sept. 11th: BBC Newsnight Video

Has someone been sitting on the FBI? BBC Newsnight transcript

Bush took FBI Agents off bin Laden family trail (TIMES OF INDIA)

FBI claims Bin Laden inquiry was frustrated (LONDON GUARDIAN)

FBI 'was told to back off bin Laden family' (SYDNEY MORNING HERALD)

Another FBI Agent Blows the Whistle on 9-11

FBI agent: I was stymied in terror probe

Whistleblower Complains of FBI Obstruction

Judicial Watch press conference featuring special FBI agent Robert Wright - impeded from terrorist investigations

Scandal Inside the FBI: Did G-Men Miss the Boat on 9-11?

SECTION OF W199I DOCUMENT FROM GREG PALAST'S BOOK 'THE BEST DEMOCRACY MONEY CAN BUY'

SOURCE

Now also Swiss say:
“The more we research, the more doubt we”
BY ELIE PETER
15.09.2006 | 12:03: 15

ZURICH - 2973 humans died with the notices of 9/11. “Bin Laden” and “aluminium Kaida”, the Bush clan cried. The world believed him. In the meantime even scientists doubt the Bush version. Also Swiss university University of Albert A. Stahel (63) and Daniele Ganser (34) place now hot questions.

“Something is correct not”, says strategy expert Stahel in the “world week” and refers to the “incomplete” official 9/11-Report of the US Government of 2004.

In relation to VIEW the university professor confirms the criticism:

Osama Ben Laden cannot be “the large godfather” behind the notices. It did not have enough means of communication.

Stahel doubts that a passenger airline cracked in the Pentagon: “For flight beginners it is actually impossible to meet the building so exactly.”

Seven hours after the twin Towers beside it the World trade center 7 collapsed. The official version: It burned for a long time. Stahel: “Nothing at all is clear.”

Diana Johnstone:

I found your posting to be highly persuasive in general for most people, whom I'm sure you're happy to serve. Yet your easy-ish dismissal of the inside possibilities (nay, probabilities) seems based on a rather innocent if not wholly ignorant understanding of how things can and often DO work. And in this case, 9/11, a far better explanation is reached beyond the box-cutter story by FIRST knowing possibility, and calculating the most likely probability. Come-on, you've heard this before.

I do not know who pulled-off "9/11", however the popular narrative happily stoked by Official-sounding reports and endless suggestions that it was 'solely the act of an outside aggressor, hell bent on the destruction of our freedoms', strains credulity and ultimately, believability. That's why every article like yours that continues to belie facts in-search of truth, makes me want to puke.

I certainly feel that my freedoms are currently suffering direct and very personal attacks, however old Binny and his boys could NEVER do what this domestic gang has been extraordinarily successful at by playing upon the whipped up fears of my more innocent and less cynical brethren citizenry.

Hahahahahahahahaha...........

Tror du, at myndighederne i USA lyver om 11. sept. 2001?
Ja 40 %

Nej 48 %

Ved ikke 12 %

Stemmer ialt: 3964

Do you think the US government has lied about 9/11?

Yes 40%, No 48%, Don´t know 12%, 3964 votes.

http://nyhederne.tv2.dk/baggrund/article.php/id-4862454.html

I hope someone has saved this, I didnt.

The video appears to have been pulled. This is the new one with the ladies talking.

http://video.google.com/videoplay?docid=-5841197953012597968&q=9%2F11+eyewitness

http://www.thepetitionsite.com/takeaction/525834923?ltl=1158296504

Everyone make sure they sign this and pass it on!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!

http://www.huffingtonpost.com/eric-boehlert/why-was-wolfowitz-so-clue_b_29486.html

text....

Why Was Wolfowitz So Clueless On The Morning of 9/11? 

Despite the exhaustive work of the 9/11 Commission and its detailed final report, the number of oddities surrounding the events of 9/11, and particularly the government's botched attempt at defend a country under attack, remain numerous. One peculiarity I've always wondered about is why Paul Wolfowitz, then the Deputy Secretary of Defense and the number two person at the Pentagon, was so completely clueless the morning of the deadly attacks. As the events unfolded live on television and senior administration officials scrambled to make sense of the horrific events, Wolfowitz appeared to be in a haze. Or perhaps a cocoon. Now, as 9/11 remembrance week draws to a close, I thought it might worth examining the odd inaction by such a senior member of the administration. The same senior official who later played a central role in planning the disastrous war in Iraq. (And no, by raising questions about Wolfowitz I'm not signing off on any larger, 9/11 conspiracy theory.)

Here's how Wolfowitz, taken from a May 9, 2003 interview transcript, described his morning on that unforgettable day:

In this day and age of big brother surveillance by the government, and the unwillingness of our congresspersons to put an end to it, I am increasingly concerned about how to keep myself anonymous on the internet. Sure, they aren't rounding up dissidents and terrorist sympathizers (9/11 truthers) and putting us in those Halliburton detention centers yet, but given the fact that the Bush administration continues to reign its terror on the world, with no end in sight, how can we protect ourselves and still communicate with one another (while we still have a free internet)?

Has anyone done research on the best ways to go about this? I recently looked into this and came upon a site called Findnot.com where the company makes a lot of claims about how it keeps your IP address from being seen. Looks like a good system, but how can we know for sure? If anybody has suggestions and especially direct experience with this, I'd appreciate some advice.

I used to always make fun of blogs, simply for the way the word itself sounds. I really used to hate them because I used to think it was America's selfish way of getting people to see ME. My old expression used to be, "You can't spell American without ME." I saw my fellow Americans, the ones in the dark anyway, as self-important know-nothings and wanted nothing to do with anything involving America's pop culture. To me, blog sounds like what I do every time I eat at McDonald's or something. You know that sound you make as you hang your head over the commode?? HAHAHA. Anyway, I now realize that a blog is a critical way of sharing factual information to debunk the Official Story of 9/11 and I will use this frequently because I have 5 years of pent-up frustration living in Tennessee to release. I didn't even use up all my energy at the Truth Movement weekend and from 6:30 am, 9/11/06 until 230 am, 9/14/06, I slept a grand total of 3 hours with at least five complete walks around Ground Zero, carrying a 20 lbs backpack ALL WEEKEND LONG, not to mention a 450 trip to North Carolina. And I’m still not exhausted. I’ve barely slept since I got to North Carolina because I’ve been so busy on the internet email people videos of mine and talking to all my new friends.

It is my firm belief that the terrorists we all speak of are indeed among us. There is an ongoing Conspiracy right here in NY! With the disaster at the WTC site, there is plenty of eveidence past and present that chimes in to re-assure us this is true.

Let's look at how the Towers fell, shall we? Many said in the beggining that "it looked like a controlled demolition" and seemingly changed their stories later on... hmmm?!?!?! There has been video released of The lease holder Larry Silverstein openly admiting that the fire department called him on sept 11th stating they arent sure they will be able to Knock down the fires in Building number 7. He then again openly admit's that he told the fire department to "PULL #7" which in the world of controlled demo to "detonate and bring down the building or structure at hand". Then silverstein tries to claim that each plane constituted as a seprate attack so that he should get more money. Can we say at the very least this is an insurance scam? I think it's a safe bet to say that.

Video of him saying this: [URL=http://video.google.com/videoplay?docid=-7750532340306101329&q=Larry+silverstein+%22pull+building+7%22]http://video.google.com/videoplay?docid=-7...l+building+7%22[/URL]