Building 7

9/11 Free Fall-- Wayne Coste...Outreach to Civil Liberty Activists

*
*
*
Wayne Coste is an electrical engineer with about thirty-five years of professional practice, as well as a dedicated volunteer for Architects and Engineers for 9/11 Truth on its Congressional Outreach and Presenter teams. Recently he's been bringing the scientific evidence for controlled demolition to civil liberty activists and presenting the information on TV as a result of another unknown activist's 9/11 Truth graffiti, which caught the public eye. In this episode of 9/11 Free Fall he discusses latest his work.

Wayne's appearance on the news can be viewed here:

http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=DmYPv46X354&feature=youtu.be

Article mentioned on show:

Insurance companies for American and United Airlines notified about controlled demolition evidence

November 28, 2012

(Sacramento, CA)  9/11 Truth activist Mark Graham sent a letter to the 12 insurance companies for the airline defendants sued by Larry Silverstein informing them about evidence of controlled demolition of the Twin Towers and Building 7 and offering to put them in touch with building experts who could provide expert testimony. 

In 2004 Larry Silverstein, who owned Building 7 and had signed a 99 year lease on the Twin Towers just six weeks before 9/11, sued United and American Airlines 1 and companies providing security at the airports (the "airline defendants").  Silverstein claimed that the airline defendants 2 had been negligent in allowing the hijackers to board and hijack the planes and fly them into the Twin Towers.  He claimed that the plane crashes and fires "proximately caused the total destruction" of the Twin Towers, Building 7 and the other buildings in the World Trade Center.  (Complaint in Case 1:08-cv-03722-AKH Document 1 Filed 04/17/08, page 2)  3

No mention has been made of the fact that it would have been impossible for those plane crashes and fires to have destroyed the buildings or the abundant evidence of controlled demolition.  The defense attorneys could make an affirmative defense of this argument and exculpatory evidence.

Graham sent his letter via certified mail to the heads of 12 insurance companies who insured the airline defendants including Lloyd’s of America, Travelers Cos, Swiss Re, Zurich American, Global Aerospace and U.S. Aircraft Insurance Group and to their attorneys.

9/11 Free Fall-- Richard Gage AIA (10/25/12)

In this special episode of 9/11 Free Fall he talks about the controlled demolition of the Twin Towers and WTC 7 on 9/11, about upcoming 9/11 Truth events he will be involved in, and speaks directly to any and all U.S. government officials who may know about the controlled demolition evidence but are choosing not to act.

9/11 Free Fall is on No Lies Radio every Thursday night at 10PM EST, 7PM PST. www.noliesrado.org

To listen to previous episodes go to www.911freefall.com

More Mass Media Breakthroughs

CBS Sunday Morning features Ed Asner questioning 9/11 and showing WTC 7’s free fall on national television
~
Fox News’ Allan Colmes also covers Asner’s views on 9/11

Help us push this media wave even higher!

Dear AE911Truth Supporter,

Over the past several days you have helped us regain the slipped ground at on PBS’s website since we achieved #1 Most Watched and Most Shared rankings with Colorado Public Television (CPT12)’s showing of “9/11: Explosive Evidence – Experts Speak Out.Thank you so much! As of this writing, your efforts have pushed us back up to the #2 Most Watched spot, after dropping for a time to #8.
 

We have always retained the "1 “Most Shared” spot, suggesting that people who see the explosive evidence are much more motivated to share it with others than are those who watch other PBS online previews and programs. That certainly does not surprise us … and it’s another point we can all make to help encourage the media to give us more and better coverage.

Coming up Live Video Stream from San Francisco_9/11: Explosive Evidence – Experts Speak Out

911 Evidence Experts Speak Out

Wed July 11th -- 7pm Pacific * 10pm Eastern * 2:00 GMT (Thu)


Click here to watch the live Video Stream




WORLD PREMIERE OF DOCUMENTARY–9/11: Explosive Evidence – Experts Speak Out — FINAL EDITION!

No Lies Radio News is proud to announce that we will be live video streaming Architects & Engineers for 9/11 Truth landmark documentary, 9/11: Explosive Evidence – Experts Speak Out. The Architects & Engineers for 9/11 Truth have already taken this film on the road on their Whirlwind World Premiere Tour across the US to over 30 cities where AE911Truth founder and CEO, Richard Gage, AIA, the director, has shown the film, personally introduced it, and has answered the tough questions that are always raised.

9/11 Truth in the WSJ?

By Josh Mitteldorf

Op-Ed News
http://www.opednews.com/articles/9-11-Truth-in-the-WSJ-by-Josh-Mitteldorf-120614-711.html

Even among progressive news sources on the web, most sites will steer clear of 9/11 Truth. Huffington Post won't touch it. CommonDreams will occasionally flirt with the edges of "conspiracy theories"; Truthout has printed attacks on 9/11 Truth . OpEdNews is one of the few places where readers and authors who believe the outline of the Bush Administration's version of the events of 9/11 and those who think the Bush Administration was itself responsible for the attacks can hang out together and hold heated debates. (The Editorial Board here at OEN is also split. For disclosure, I've been the Board member leading the charge for more coverage.)

You may suspect the heavy hand of censorship, or you may think that these well-established liberal sources are sensibly avoiding speculation and superstition. But whatever your beliefs, you'd have to think that the Wall St Journal is the last place you'd look for revelations about a 9/11 cover-up.

Censorship reversed - Avaaz community members support restoration of Building 7 petition

In a surprising reversal the managers of the petition website Avaaz.org have restored a petition asking NIST, Congress and President Obama to acknowledge what the free fall descent of WTC Building 7 means. This was due to a poll of randomly selected Avaaz members, the majority saying they wanted the petition to be restored.

In late April I started a petition asking NIST to come clean about the implications of free fall in Building 7. Avaaz removed it after 89 people had signed it and sent me a message claiming that my petition had violated their community petitions agreement / terms of use. It did not. Despite multiple efforts to reach Avaaz via their website, phone and even a paper letter they never replied.

On May 7 I rewrote the petition and gave it a new title: "Revise the U.S. government final report on the collapse of Building 7".

http://avaaz.org/en/petition/Revise_the_US_government_final_report_on_the_collapse_of_Building_7/

844 people signed the petition by the evening of May 22. (One friend told me he had seen 883.) Avaaz did not help AT ALL with this petition. They never featured it or made it available on their website. Every one of those 844 individuals who signed it found out about it through a friend. Hundreds of people shared it via facebook, twitter or email.

Unfortunately that night at 6:30 Avaaz removed my petition. Once again they sent me a message claiming that my petition violated their community petitions agreement / terms of use. Once again this was a false claim. Once again they refused to respond to my messages and phone calls.

Get serious with Avaaz about my Building 7 petition

To all Readers of 911blogger,

Avaaz has still not responded to my message to them about removing my petition about Building 7. I wrote to them last Thursday, as soon as I realized they had taken it down. I also mailed them a letter in the U.S. mail that went out Saturday or today.

They have falsely claimed to me that I created a petition that violated their Community Agreement / Terms of Use.

They have falsely told other Avaaz members that I did so.

They have removed the petition from my account too so that it says that I have not created any petitions.

Will you help me?

Please write to Avaaz and ask them to reinstate my petition.

You could write a 2 line message; copy and paste the following:

"Please reinstate the petition about World Trade Center Building 7 that was at
https://secure.avaaz.org/en/petition/Come_clean_about_free_fall_of_the_World_Trade_Center_Building_7/ . This petition complied in every possible way with the Avaaz Community Agreement / Terms of Use and should not have been removed."

Here's the web page to use to write to them.

http://www.avaaz.org/en/contact

Rudolph Giuliani Confronted on Building 7

University of Florida - Rudy Giuliani Confronted on Building 7
January 26th, 2012

Bob Tuskin of The Bob Tuskin Radio Show confronts Rudy Giuliani over Building 7 and his possible role in 9/11.
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=_0yr1yurLEI

This was covered in the local mainstream news paper:
http://www.alligator.org/news/campus/article_bd201374-48ab-11e1-b8ef-0019bb2963f4.html

The Gainesville Sun: http://www.gainesville.com/article/20120126/ARTICLES/120129608

95.1 FM, The Bridge: Debunking the Big NIST Lie of Finding No Evidence for Explosions on 9/11

Nor Cal Truth    

Milo is the host of Touch, a daily program from 5:00-6:00 PM Pacific on The Bridge, 95.1 FM in Guerneville. Milo has invited me (Brian Romanoff) to be a regular guest on his show to try to bring more light into the events of 9/11. I appreciate the opportunity and I hope you enjoy the show.

This week we discuss the big NIST lie of finding no evidence for explosions during the WTC collapse investigation.

Listen here: http://norcaltruth.org/2011/12/13/95-1-fm-the-bridge-the-big-nist-lie-of-no-explosions-on-911/

 

 

Available as a live-stream every Monday 5:00-6:00 PM Pacific at the website provided below:

The World Trade Center Buildings were built to last. Plane impacts and fires alone could not have accounted for the destruction in New York at the WTC complex.

New Video - Science of 9/11 in 6 parts

This version in 6 parts has well synchronized audio - video.

The film features Richard Gage AIA, Dr. Stephen E. Jones, David Chandler and members of Architects and Engineers for 911 Truth, with original music courtesy of Eva James.

The presentation proves the world trade center buildings were demolished with explosives. It shows why a new scientific investigation and judicial inquiry is needed.

This edited compilation is presented under terms of "Fair Use". The intention of this creation is for non-profit, educational and personal use. Portions of copyrighted material may be included under Section 107 of the Copyright Act of 1976. Allowance is made for "fair use" for purposes such as criticism, comment, news reporting, teaching and research. Any other use may require that permission be obtained from the original copyright owner.

NEW VIDEO - The Science of 9/11

The Science of 9/11
This original compilation has a running time of 55 minutes.

If you would like a free DVD quality down link that does not have a problem with the video-audio synchronization, send an email to
911TrueStory@Gmail.com

Current download links include:

You Tube link
http://youtu.be/d8Z_CchNF8A

MP4 file
http://www.archive.org/download/Science_Of_9-11/Science_Of_9-11.mp4

QuickTime .mov file
http://www.archive.org/download/Science_Of_9-11/Science_Of_9-11.mov

This film features Richard Gage AIA, Dr. Stephen E. Jones, David Chandler and members of Architects and Engineers for 911 Truth, with original music courtesy of Eva James.

The presentation shows why a new scientific investigation and judicial inquiry is needed.

New Video - Science of September 11 - Free DVD download

See below for the download link to save the DVD ISO file (over 3.1 GB).

https://www.adrive.com/public/ddb8f6f096e2904f6f52bb4b2cb3fb8b75f7259e837cc44d473bcbeaaeee601b.html

After it is saved on your computer or flash drive, you can burn it to a DVD using a program such as ImgBurn.
You can get this at http://ImgBurn.com

You can also download a MP4 file, using You Tube Downloader software, using this link:
http://youtu.be/zDlm3DDQ7BE

Judge Hellerstein: "strange, improbable" events in WTC7 lawsuit

.
"Hellerstein said it was not reasonable for Silverstein and Citigroup to foresee the 'strange, improbable, and attenuated chain of events that led to 7 World Trade Center's collapse and the crushing of Con Edison's substation.' He added: 'Nothing in common experience of history could give rise to a reasonably foreseeable risk relating to the chain of events flowing from the terrorists and their hijackings to the destruction of the Con Edison substation.'"

Citing scope of 9/11, NY judge tosses 7 WTC suit
September 23, 2011 7:21 PM

(AP) NEW YORK — In tossing out a negligence lawsuit, a judge on Friday cited the "strange, improbable" events that destroyed a 47-story World Trade Center building a decade ago on Sept. 11, several hours after the 110-story twin towers fell.

The claims by the Consolidated Edison Co. of New York were "too farfetched and tenuous" to survive, U.S. District Judge Alvin Hellerstein said.

Experts Speak Out - 30 minute IPOD version, remix video

http://www.archive.org/details/September11ExpertsInterviewed

This is my suggestion for a mp4 (mpeg4) video that can run on IPOD and go viral. It runs 25 minutes, and can be downloaded at this link.