Support 911Blogger


Building 7

Contest: Submit Your Toughest Building 7 Question and We'll Ask It!

Ask the<br />
Candidate - Presented by Lehigh Valley 9/11 Truth

By Jeff Jacobucci/Join911Truth.com

Lehigh Valley, Pennsylvania - Lehigh Valley 9/11 Truth announces, today, that it will be giving residents of the Lehigh Valley the opportunity to go straight to their Congressman with their toughest questions about the destruction of Building 7.

How was the building destroyed?  How was freefall possible?  How did nano-thermite get into the debris?  Who committed this horrible crime?  And, why?

It's been nine years.  We feel that your Congressman ought to be able to give you a straight answer by now on just, exactly, what the scoop is about Building 7.

The rules of the contest are:

3 Beams for Truth on Sept 11, 2010

9/11 Truth activists put up a third beam of light on September 11, 2010 alongside the 2, to remind the public that a third building was also destroyed on 9/11: WTC Building 7, the most obvious instance of controlled demolition, with only minor fires, and falling symmetrically into its own footprint at near freefall acceleration

www.ae911truth.org/en/news/41-articles/373-3-beams-for-truth-on-sept-11-2010-.html

AE911Truth shines 3rd Beam into NYC skyline for WTC 7

1280 Architects & Engineers

Launch Third Light Beam into NYC Night Skyline on 9th Anniversary of September 11th

Represents WTC Building 7 still officially unexplained free-fall collapse & explosive implications


NEW YORK CITY, Sept. 11 – At 9:11 p.m. on the 9th anniversary of the September attacks, the members of the 1280 strong Architects & Engineers for 9/11 Truth lit up the skies over Manhattan with a towering 2 billion-candlepower beam of light to raise public awareness that three, not just two, World Trade Center high-rise buildings collapsed symmetrically at near free-fall acceleration on 9/11, though only two were hit by planes.

‘Why is there a Third Beam in my skyline?’ New Yorkers are asking tonight. Architects & Engineers for 9/11 Truth founder Richard Gage, AIA, who held a

PRESS RELEASE: New Scientific Evidence Undermines Afghanistan War

FOR IMMEDIATE RELEASE

On the eve of the 9th anniversary of 9/11, support for the war in Afghanistan took a serious blow today. Simultaneous press conferences were held in New York and Los Angeles to present startling new information refuting the official 9/11 narrative used to justify the war. Also announced were three major professional groups which have joined the worldwide, and ever-growing, “9/11 Truth Movement”.

In a striking show of unity, representatives of “Scientists for 9/11 Truth”, “U.S. Military Officers for 9/11 Truth” and “Actors & Artists for 9/11 Truth” presented their findings and unveiled their eye-opening websites. Each non-profit group has launched a petition calling for a new, transparent investigation.

The Zapruder Film of 9/11 - Daniel Sunjata

Zapruder film of 911

Click to watch this stunning new video featuring Daniel Sunjata!

This new video, narrated by actor Daniel Sunjata (Rescue Me, The Bronx is Burning), compares the potential of Building 7‘s footage with the effect the Zapruder Film had on the American society.

Precognitive dissonance: How did so many know Building 7 would fall?

It’s clear from primary sources of evidence that quite a few people believed Building 7 was going to collapse. Such perceptive anticipation might be easy to understand if it was common for modern steel-frame skyscrapers to collapse from fires. But since this had never happened prior to September 11, 2001, we have to ask ourselves why the collapse was so easy to predict. The Architects & Engineers for 9/11 Truth suspect foul play. Ubiquitous evidence of foreknowledge adds support to the hypothesis that explosives were used to demolish Building 7.

Read entire story here: http://www.ae911truth.org/en/news/41-articles/361-precognitive-dissonance-how-did-so-many-know-building-7-would-fall-.html

Kenny's Sideshow: Building What? Just how did Muslims bring down WTC7?

Thursday, September 2, 2010

BuildingWhat? Just how did Muslims bring down WTC7?

 
Just lucky I guess.

And we should thank those 19 Muslim daredevils and Bin Laden for suspending the laws of physics and bringing down WTC 1 & 2 so neatly straight down in a pile and for turning much of the mass into dust so that there wasn't as much debris to pick up.

Had the 110-story Twin Towers fallen over sideways, they would have caused massive destruction in lower Manhattan, destroying dozens of other buildings and killing tens of thousands of people.

Those guys had it out for Larry Silverstein. They destroyed all of his properties on the morning of 9/11 except one, building 7, but finally got it to collapse around 5:20 that afternoon.

Bin Laden had to have been cussing and fussing most of the day about Flight 93 getting shot down. You know, the plane that was supposed to have hit building 7, the Grand Finale, the trifecta.

But just as luck would have it, all it really took was a few fires, no plane needed, and building 7 just fell into its footprint and at near free fall speed. I can hear Bin Laden as he watched the event on his big screen TV in his cave saying; "Whew ... about time."


I like this new video (below) from BuildingWhat. They've taken out the sound so there's no distraction from the visuals and you can focus on the collapse.

New unedited video of WTC 7 with audio of EXPLOSION‏

The widely shown footage of WTC 7 collapsing that we've all seen has always been an edited one. Here's the longer version with the full audio where an explosion can clearly be heard at the 11 second mark which initiates the penthouse roof collapse just before global collapse. This footage was just released after a Freedom of Information Act Request.

See the WEBSITE One Million New Yorkers Will Be Directed To

The new buildingwhat.org

Dear Friends,

BuildingWhat.org is up and running! A few weeks from now, thousands of New Yorkers - maybe even millions - will visit BuildingWhat.org to learn about Building 7 for the first time. Please take a look, and while you're there, please consider donating to help put the "BuildingWhat?" ad on every TV screen in New York.

We’ve raised $25,000 more since the ad premiered last Thursday, bringing us to a total of $39,765, and it has been viewed over 100,000 times on YouTube. Thank you for making the first week of the ad’s existence a huge success.

Two Important Action Items!

1) Can you forward the URL http://BuildingWhat.org to at least 10 friends so that another 100,000 people learn about the “BuildingWhat?” campaign?

New Commemorative Video for 9th 9/11 Anniversary Promoting "Building What?"

David Ray Griffin suggested in his "Building What?" speech that we all do what we can to ensure no one ever responds like Judge Lehner when Building 7 is mentioned.

Here's a new video that is a big step in that direction:

“BuildingWhat?” Banners – Help Spread the Word

BuildingWhat.org

BuildingWhat Banners

Help spread the word by putting one of these banners on your website, and be sure to embed the ad too:

BuildingWhat.org BuildingWhat.org/banners

Watch The Ad One Million New Yorkers Will See!

Watch the NYC BuildingWhat? Video

Dear Friends,

We are pleased and tremendously excited to share this groundbreaking TV ad with you for the first time. We hope, with your help, to be able to show it to one million New Yorkers one month from now. Please go to BuildingWhat.org to watch the ad and please donate generously. Every $750 we raise is enough for another spot to reach another 10,000 people. Your donation will be fully tax-deductible. 5% of it will go to the WTC Rescuers Foundation. And 5% of it will be matched by another generous donor.

Our strategy for buying spots is guided by two principles. Firstly, showing it to audiences who will respond productively and influence the public discussion, such as young people, academics, journalists and the political class. And secondly, repetition!

We will be sending off the ad two weeks from now. Between now and then we welcome your comments. We're all in this together!

Very truly yours,

Setting the record straight regarding the accelerated fall of WTC building 7

I am incorrectly quoted (to put it mildly) in http://911booger.blogspot.com/2007/05/steven-jones-on-wtc-7-collapse-we.html :
"Steven Jones (above, left) admitted today that he and other 9/11 researchers "screwed up on the collapse time of WTC 7. We blew it."

No, I never said that. The blog goes on with its despicable misrepresentations, putting words in my mouth that I never said:

"Responding to the overnight controversy, Steven Jones announced this morning that WTC 7 did indeed take over 13 seconds to collapse. 'We screwed up. We had never seen the CBS video when we claimed that it took WTC 7 6.5 seconds to collapse. We only relied on the street video that does not show the Penthouses. By the time we saw the CBS video, we had so much invested in the 6.5-second collapse time, we could not disappoint our supporters who were successfully using the 6.5 free fall time to push 9/11 Truth. We just ignored the evidence.' "

David Chandler Updates: 2 new videos and a video interview

1. I have completed a video showing the analysis of the Balzac-Vitry controlled demolition that used hydrolics rather than explosives to initiate a total demolition. This analysis shows deceleration upon collision, as predicted in the paper, "The Missing Jolt: A Simple Refutation of the NIST-Bazant Collapse Hypothesis," by Graeme MacQueen and Tony Szamboti. It also illustrates the symmetry of destruction, contrary to the "crush down" followed by "crush up" scenario propounded by Zdenek Bazant. http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=NiHeCjZlkr8