Members of the NC 9/11 Truth group (http://nc911truth.blogspot.com) met yesterday and we were throwing around ideas, and thought a good campaign would be to promote people doing youtube videos of 9/11 truth activism related to V for Vendetta, and possibly doing something on the mall on 11/5 with 9/11 truth activists dressed up as V.

The 5th of november is 2 days before election, and right after halloween, so people could get the masks/costumes for Halloween anyway.

The V for Vendetta 9/11 video clip is very popular and widespread throughout the 'net.

We have talked to the DC 9/11 Truth group and they are very interested.

Thoughts?

I am a TRUTH SEEKER from {Warr Acres} Oklahoma City, Oklahoma 73122 looking to connect with THINKERS such as myself. We know 911 was an inside job, and it is shameful to think the course of action our nation is taking by allowing the Bush regime to continue in this manner! REVOLUTION is not a dirty word. It is not un-American! It is what a Patriot who loves their Country does in times of crisis! I want to share info with THINKER’S who feel the same, and I have videos such as; Loose Change, 911 Eyewitness, Road to Tyranny, Rise of a Police State, Terror Storm, etc to share with others as well, and will continue to chip away at this injustice towards defenseless countries for oil and world dominance! Too many lies are being sold to Americans in the name of security from terrorists to take away our Liberties! We want OUR COUNTRY back! That’s why we need a NEW CONGRESS! WE WANT the TRUTH from our government!

Since taking the RED PILL in March of this year I have attempted to get my message to Main Stream Media KFOR in Oklahoma City on the 10:00 PM newscast of THE RANT, and to date have made no progress whatsoever! I’ll be looking for a response from concerned Americans in the OKC area who wish to spread the TRUTH and take back OUR COUNTRY and live according to our CONSTITUTION! We do not want a dictator!

We need a new poll question. These polls are only voted on by users of the system.

If you have any ideas, or can come up with some, for the new poll question please post your suggestion here.

Donna Marsh O'Connor lost her daughter Vanessa Lang Langer on 9/11/2001. She recently appeared at the National Press Club in Washington D.C. on 9/11/2006. The purpose of her appearance was to call for a new investigation into the attacks of 9/11. I thought it would be prudent for people to know a little bit about Mrs. O'Connor, and her story.

1. I understand you taught writing and rhetoric at Syracuse University for 20+ years. What was the average day like in your classroom, and what kinds of topics did you cover? How did you become involved in that track, and why did you retire?

I did not retire, I stepped down. There were very few average days in my classroom. For 20 years, I taught students to describe what they see before their eyes, what the smell, what they touch before they came to the point of judgement. My focus in teaching writing was always to ask students to think of themselves as individual agents in the center of a public text, to think about the way pronouns work to mask their agency (I, We You, etc...) and the way those pronouns obviate questions a writer needs to have in order not to simply replicate ideas in the collective air. In short, I taught my students to be more conscious as American writers and to begin to sort through American discursive polarities and to try to account for more sophisticated nuances and differences. Most of my years in the classroom were life changing for me and (my students often reported) for them, too. I never taught or suggested students believe what I said. I simply helped them to understand in complex ways that writers must come to a deep understaning of "others" before coming to judgements. My courses were difficult, but (I was told) worth it. Increasingly, after 9/11, I saw that my own individual agency as a teacher and a creator of text in the classroom was changing. At the same time, the American public texts were becoming more explosive. Students (not all of them) wanted to back away. The media always feature into my teaching. Now, increasingly, the media was becoming more and more about covering up the key details of issues. I saw that if I stayed I would become less able to postpone judgement myself. Rather than teatching students processes of questioning and understanding, I would have been (perhaps rightly (interesting word!)) accused of putting forward an anti-administration agenda. For me, that meant time to step down.

(more after the jump..)

I wanted to share this with more people than would find it buried in the blog posts below, because I feel like the faith based approach of the anonymous person to whom I'm responding, represents the approach of many both inside and outside our movement who appear to have little experience with formal logic. And I mean the kind of thinking you pick up by reading, debating people, going to college, or just having a curiosity bigger than your ego. The '9/11 truth movement' is guided by a logical, legal, and journalistic approach to the facts and their promotion. While there are those blindly following obscure lines of inquiry who will only distract us, we should reach out to those who might have strayed down an obscure path, but have a genuine concern for the truth.

Message posted to the following thread:

http://www.911blogger.com/node/3321

"I believe some form of nuclear device was used at the WTC. The chances are it is still top secret so we have no way of knowing what it is.

There is simply no other explanation for the rapid and near-total pulverisation of the concrete. I am no expert so I have no facts to back me up but I am convinced that when the truth is known these facts will be made clear.

On Thursday, October 5th, get a posse and infiltrate your local WCW march/demo with 9/11 Truth.

Here's a list of cities/actions in the US:

http://worldcantwait.net/index.php?option=com_content&task=view&id=2418&_event=14

In San Francisco, the group (a front for the RCP - I have no qualms about highjacking their agenda) has a 24 hour permit for Justin Herman Plaza. That's a lot of bullhorning time...

9/11 TRUTH NOW! 

'US paying Pak $70-80 million a month'

Chidanand Rajghatta
[ 29 Sep, 2006 0251hrs ISTTIMES NEWS NETWORK ]

WASHINGTON: A British analyst has stirred a hornet's nest by revealing that the United States is bankrolling Pakistan's military ruler Pervez Musharraf to the extent of $70-80 million a month, adding fuel to the dictator's incendiary visit to the West this month.

The unnamed analyst has made the disclosure in a British ministry of defence think-tank paper that has subsequently been disowned by London as "not representing the views of the MoD or the government."

While much attention has been drawn to the analyst's contention that Pakistan's spy agency ISI is supporting terrorism, the portion about the payola for Musharraf, as reported by BBC, has embarrassed Washington, which is already chafing from Musharraf's own disclosure that the US paid bounty money to the Pakistan government for handing over wanted Al Qaida terrorists.

"Musharraf knows that time is running out for him...at some point the US is likely to withdraw funding (and possibly even protection) of him estimated at $70-80 million a month," the analyst wrote, adding, "Without US funding his position will become increasingly tenuous."

This story firmly supports the LIHOP theory.

But don't be alarmed, all you MIHOP theorists. It does nothing to dismiss the possibility of MIHOP. It does nothing to disprove facilitation by members of our government.

What it does prove is that the attacks of 9/11 were clearly on the radar by elements of our intelligence agencies, while the execute branch was stonewalling the issue.

Think about it. The head of the CIA tells the National Security Advisor of an IMMINENT attack - and she brushes them off?

Taken in concert with the testimony of Lt. Col. Anthony Shaffer and the facts regarding Able Danger, we clearly have high ranking member of our military - including a 2-star general, personally intervening to protect Atta - or the persona of Atta - patsy or not - therefore adding the MIHOP element to this story.

This is a huge story - and one 9/11 activists should be making as much noise as possible about:

New York Times

October 1, 2006
9/11 Panel Members Weren’t Told of Meeting

By PHILIP SHENON
WASHINGTON, Oct. 2 — Members of the Sept. 11 commission said today that they were alarmed that they were told nothing about a White House meeting in July 2001 at which George J. Tenet, then the director of central intelligence, is reported to have warned Condoleezza Rice, then the national security adviser, about an imminent Al Qaeda attack and failed to persuade her to take action.

There is an elephant in the room of the 9/11 Truth Movement. A few can honestly say they can’t see the elephant. A larger number can clearly see it, but have somehow convinced themselves it is really a piano. Yet the elephant remains. It is big. It is menacing. No one really knows what to do about it. But if we do not deal with the elephant, all our efforts for 9/11 truth may be for naught. Our movement will lose credibility, and will drift into the kind of obsolescence and irrelevance now associated with the theories of JFK’s assassination.

The elephant in the bedroom of the 9/11 Truth Movement is the obvious connection of the attacks with the state of Israel and its fanatical supporters within the United States government, military, and media. A sampling of some of the evidence:

• The Israeli newspaper Ha’aretz reported that the Israeli message service ODIGO broadcast a warning to Jewish employees of the Trade Center on the morning of the attacks.

• The company in charge of security at all the involved airports was an Israeli company called International Consultants for Targeted Security. Its president is Menachem Atzmon.

• The owner of the Trade Center buildings was Larry Silverstein, who is reported to have close relationships with leading Likud party Israelis such as Benjamin Netanyahu.

A 7 part lecture on the Constitution. Learn something.

http://video.google.com/videoplay?docid=8321747074978323622&q=constitution+class

http://video.google.com/videoplay?docid=4870224407360952135&q=constitution+class

http://video.google.com/videoplay?docid=-8018874590848634400&q=constitution+class

http://video.google.com/videoplay?docid=-1980674934527237459&q=constitution+class

http://video.google.com/videoplay?docid=-5509747643152392910&q=constitution+class

http://video.google.com/videoplay?docid=-3601271545224839349&q=constitution+class

http://video.google.com/videoplay?docid=5824859883322263421&q=constitution+class

This is the editorial comment at the top of the Buzzflash frontpage right now:

Members of the Sept. 11 commission said today that they were alarmed that they were told nothing about a White House meeting in July 2001 at which George J. Tenet, then the director of central intelligence, warned Condoleezza Rice about an imminent Al Qaeda attack. Philip D. Zelikow, the executive director of the Sept. 11 commission, is quoted in this article. He is a past and current aide to Rice and was, one can assume, selected to be the staff head of the committee so that the White House could suppress the truth and direct the committee through a loyal surrogate.

Here's the linked article:

http://tinyurl.com/qsro6

Get this video and more at MySpace.com

Okay, this is a little off topic, but I had to show you a Video that was created off of the speech of the 72 year
old senator Ted Stevens trying to describe how the Internet Works. THis is who we have running our gov't. deciding on
Net Nuetrality. Please note....the stutters are not a re-mix, it is how he gave the speech!

This first video is the Original Speech

http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=URYNnF5mz84

Then watch what somebody did with it here.

http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=EtOoQFa5ug8&mode=related&search=

After you listen to this..........tell me?

What is wrong with our gov't?

Just a little 2-minutes of fun, before I read this entire Iran attack blog again...
:)

Has anybody else seen these pictures? This is two pictures, one of Flight 11 seconds before impacting the North Tower, the second is of the explosion. It's looks legit to me because there are no clouds in the sky and it’s a well-known fact that Flight 11 went all the way through the North Tower. This video doesn’t really help the Truth Movement any, I just thought it was an interesting NEW piece of history. If I’m wrong, don’t be afraid to say so, but it looks real to me.