This YouTube user is releasing some new videos recently about the destruction of 9/11: www.youtube.com/user/MysticalGrooveWTC
Search "engineer" to jump right to the quote.
While huddling with others in the WTC7 lobby, EMS Division Chief John Peruggia offers the following:
"Some engineer type person, and several of us were huddled talking in the lobby and it was brought to my attention, it was believed that the structural damage that was suffered to the towers was quite significant and they were very confident that the buildingís stability was compromised and they felt that the north tower was in danger of a near imminent collapse."
Here is the reason given for why a runner was sent to the command post with this information:
"I work for the Chief of the Department, I donít have a fire ground radio, so I had no
direct communications with my boss at that time..."
Both of these accounts were before 9:59 am when the South Tower collapsed.
We need to find out who the "engineer type" fellow was.
Profound Implications of the Observed Downward Acceleration of the North Tower -- Article by David Chandler Published
The editors of the Journal of 9/11 Studies are pleased to announce publication of the following peer-reviewed article in the February 2010 volume of the Journal:
Destruction of the World Trade Center North Tower and Fundamental Physics
By David Chandler
Physicist David Chandler continues his insightful analysis of the destruction of three WTC skyscrapers on 9/11/2001 in this very readable paper. From the summary:
I was going back through the NEADS tapes we released in 2007 and discovered something a little strange ...
DRM1 DAT2 Channel 4 ID Op
08:46:15: New York told me to hold on, you heard that, right?
08:46:36: Come on New York. (Dooley again) You know what, you know what, let's
get a tail number off of for American 11. (Roundtree) Call Boston, American 11 tail
number. (Dooley) Tell them we need the tail number of the aircraft, (male voice)
American one one. (Roundtree to New York) Yes it is, (right now he's primary only.)
Do you have Mode 3 or anything? Or a location? (Fm not showing anything, no.) Lat
Ion? (Hold on, I'll get a lat lon.) Good.
NORTH TOWER IS STRUCK AT 8:46:48.
08:47:05: (Dooley?) We're going to get an updated lat Ion now. (to background
question) We called Boston his filed one [Mode 3] was 1443, but he's not working that,
he's primary only, we're getting an updated lat Ion position. (I'm showing 40 39 North.)
40 39 North. (74 03 West) 74 03 West.
08:47:35: End of HUNTRESS call to NY AMIS
If you input that Lat/Long into Google Maps ...
The roofline of WTC1 (The North Tower) begins dropping with sudden onset and accelerates uniformly downward at about 64% of the acceleration of gravity (g) until it disappears into the dust. This means it is meeting resistance equal to about 36% of its weight. The implication of this, however, is that the force it is exerting on the lower section of the building is also only 36% of the weight of the falling section. This is much less than the force it would exert if it were at rest. The acceleration data thus prove that the falling top section of the building cannot be responsible for the destruction of the lower section of the building.
An anonymous source has released high resolution DVD mpg2 footage of the North Tower & Building 7 collapse clips, reported here on November 1st, 2008: http://www.911blogger.com/node/18358 Also the source has allowed the release of video of the South Tower, and made all 3 available in high quality downloadable DVD file mpg's. These files are cut from source recording DVD VOB files so there is no quality loss, however the sound has been removed, and the video is edited. The source wishes to remain anonymous at this point. View all 3 clips here:
Details Emerge on new WTC Collapse Videos
The Corbett Report talks to source connected to the footage
The Corbett Report
06 November, 2008
A source connected to the previously+unreleased+footage of the collapse of WTC1 and WTC7 which suddenly appeared on internet video-sharing site Veoh.com last weekend has revealed details about the footage to The Corbett Report.
According to the source, the videos available on the internet come from a DVD that was compiled from raw footage taken in New York on September 11. The video on the internet has not been edited or manipulated in any way from the footage on the DVD, although the 'replay' of each collapse has been slowed down by 50 percent. The source indicated, however, that the raw footage had been edited before it was put on the DVD, thus explaining the sudden cut from a close-up of the North Tower to a long shot of the entire building with the collapse already underway.
Maybe I am repeating myself - But for possible newcomers to this website I feel this is one of the most obvious evidence that the official story of 9/11 is false - and I feel it is worth repeating.
The official account of what happened to the Twin Towers is that they "collapsed" because of weakened steel. But after watching these three videos available on YouTube and VideoGoogle it is absolutely clear to me that gravity alone not possibly could have pulverized these massive buildings!
Note the ENORMOUS mushroom-shaped-dust-cloud throwing hundreds of thousand tons of massive steel beams and concrete - several hundred meters outwards as it explodes from top to bottom with ENORMOUS force!
The Explosion Few Noticed
Controlled Demolition is Visually Obvious
There have been an increasing number of eye witness reports of explosions within the World Trade Center buildings on September 11th 2001. Most notably William Rodriguez has spoken publicly of explosions in the sub-basements of the towers before any aircraft struck them (1). Many police and firefighters have reported explosions as the towers came down (2). Not to mention all the video taped 'regular people' speaking of explosions. So for what it's worth, I will highlight an explosion that is visually obvious but few have focused on.
The collapse of the North Tower (WTC1) happened after the South Tower's implosion. It was a little different than the first tower to go down. The difference was that it started with a very strong, visually obvious explosion.
Folks, it took more than 3 researchers several months to create this study, and it was only possible with the released blueprints. The stories about explosions in the basement and other floors of the North Tower (WTC1) were not new.
The official explanation was kerosine exploding down the elevator shafts.
To this day we wondered what really happened there, what was the real cause, what was the intention of this explosions.
This study set the record straight. There is no possible way that jet fuel or kerosine could be cause for that explosions- it was technically impossible, indeed, when you look at what floors were harmed and what was installed there, a totally new explanation comes in sight.
Go and look for yourself. I've studied the work some time and found no mistake.
In fact, there are several other researchers here in Germany who confirmed the study in total independently, without the knowing of the study itself, only with the keywords and the blueprints in mind.
Here it is:
the fact that WTC7 did not collapse until 5.20 pm, several hours after the Twin Towers fell, may indicate that there was a foul-up in the plan. It would have made more sense if WTC7 had collapsed at about the same time as the North Tower. Consider....if it HAD collapsed at the same time, then the administration could easily have made the case that it was largely knocked down by falling debris from the North Tower. The piles of wreckage would have provided few clues to show that this was not true. Speculate that the explosives set in the building did NOT detonate at the appointed time, forcing them to act off-script, lighting some strange looking fires on a few seperated floors of the building to create a scenario that provided SOME justification for a collapse. That may be why the fires looked so unlikely. At 5:20 it was judged that they dared wait no longer, and having repaired the computer glitch or whatever it was that prevented them from blowing the building to coincide with the North Tower, they went ahead and demolished WTC7 hours late. That makes WTC7 absolutely a wide chink in their armour.
Research team receive threats after releasing 9/11 simulation
By Mikel Livingston
Publication Date: 06/27/07
The research team behind a scientifically rendered 3-D animation of the Sept. 11 attack on the World Trade Center is beginning to experience the effects of its 2 1/2 year project – not all of which is positive.
The animation, which depicts the crash of American Airlines Flight 11 into the North Tower, was placed on Purdue's Department of Computer Science Web site in early April and has since garnered nationwide media attention from CNN.com and NBC news.
"It is not easy to see the tragedy in such vivid detail," said Christoph Hoffmann, a computer science professor and a lead researcher for the project. "But (the animation) has generated a lot of debate, which is positive."
But, as the team has since found, there is a darker side to success.
I believe the reader will find that the following information proves without a doubt that terrorists used an explosive device in the subleves of the North Tower.
The Case for an Explosive Device In The Sublevels of the WTC North Tower
Author: Swing Dangler
I will not attempt the blame game with this premise. I am not a structural engineer or an explosives expert. I do have reasonable doubts about the official story. My research to this point on a personal level has been with a trained explosive expert in the U.S. military and with a construction engineer. I have read reports in support of the NIST and rebuttals to the NIST report. I have also read the NIST report summary as posted online. The reason for this hypothesis is to consider what assisted in the global collapse of the Twin Towers. The existence for this hypothesis is three-fold.
1. The NIST did not attempt to explain the reason for a global collapse nor consider the hypothesis which I proposed. Does that make the existence of explosive devices(ED) invalid? No.
9/11 Survivor Speaks
Apr 22, 2007 - The last person out of the North Tower on September 11th spoke to Central Illinoisans at the Lakeview Museum in Peoria. William Rodriguez shared with area residents his final moments in the North Tower just before it fell.
Rodriguez is at the tail end of his Midwest speaking tour. He hopes speaking out will change the way the 9/11 investigation is being handled.
"We have basically put out here the problems that we had with the 9/11 Commission, the problems that we had from the National Institute of Safety and Technology and now we are getting them addressed," Rodriguez said.
The Midwest Chapter of Citizens for Truth sponsored this event. From Peoria, Rodriguez plans to take his speaking tour back to New York and then worldwide.
a flying object hit the WTC North Tower (Wtc1)
According to the airline BTS database Flight 11 never flew on 9/11.
http://www.osamawasframed.com/flight11.html << Very interesting!!!
The plane designated flight 11 when airborne took off from Gate 32, wheels off 8:00am
Flight 11 passengers were seen boarding a plane from Gate 26, wheels off @ 8:10am
WHAT THE @!#$%^& !!!!
you mean they don't know?
Has any of you truthers phoned up and asked?
October 8, 2006
Thunderous "booms" can be heard coming from the North Tower seconds before it falls down in this recently discovered 9/11 interview with BBC correspondent Stephen Evans:
(I recommend wearing headphones while watching and listening to this video clip. If you do not have headphones, try turning up the volume on your computer speakers to pick up the sound of explosions and the reactions from bystanders)
While the "booms" are occurring, bystanders begin pointing and looking in the direction of the North Tower. One bystander can be heard saying "Oh my God!". A few seconds after that another explosion can be heard, and the person being interviewed, Stephen Evans, covers his ears in a fright and turns around to see the North Tower begin to fall. (Continued...)